Compare/CaseIH MXM190 Maxxum vs CaseIH Puma 165 X
Search

CaseIH MXM190 Maxxum vs CaseIH Puma 165 X

Verdict: CaseIH MXM190 Maxxum vs CaseIH Puma 165 X

The CaseIH MXM190 Maxxum and the CaseIH Puma 165 X are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Puma 165 X leads on rated power with 165 hp against 164 hp. CaseIH Puma 165 X is the newer design (2018 vs 2002). In short: choose the CaseIH Puma 165 X for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH MXM190 Maxxum if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH MXM190 Maxxum Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH Puma 165 X Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
164 hp
165 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
Gear 2 used for pull test.Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Differential lock
rear standardReference
Trailer brakes
pneumaticReference
Variants
TM190
similar New Holland modelReference
Engine
Engine
141.7 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
102.6 kWReference
Displacement
7.5 LReference
6.7 LReference
Bore/Stroke
112 x 127 mmReference
104 x 132 mmReference
Power
141.7 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
17.0:1Reference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
18.9 LReference
Coolant capacity
26.1 LReference
Max power
102.6 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
122.0 kWReference
Fuel tank
330.1 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
48.1 LReference
Engine (gross)
123.0 kWReference
Engine (max)
134.2 kWReference
Emissions
Stage IVReference
Rated Power (gross)
123.0 kWReference
Maximum Power (gross)
134.2 kWReference
Torque
770.2 NmReference
Torque RPM
1500Reference
Starter
electricReference
Transmission
Gears
19 forward and 6 reverseReference
19 forward and 6 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
119.3 kWReference
PTO (tested)
128.3 kWReference
Hydraulic system
89.9 LReference
Type
full power shiftReference
partial power shiftReference
Capacity
89.9 LReference
Pressure
189.6 barReference
210.0 barReference
Valves
4 to 5Reference
Pump flow
120.0 lpmReference
110.1 lpmReference
SCV flow
98.4 lpmReference
Total flow
184.3 lpmReference
Steering flow
64.3 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IIReference
III/IIReference
Control
electronic lower-link sensingReference
electronic draft controlReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
7749 kgReference
6616 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulicReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000/1000E (1.375)Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
124.8 kWReference
Rear valves
4Reference
Mid valves
3Reference
Front lift
3571 kgReference
Engine RPM
1000@1895Reference
Front PTO Type
1000Reference
Capacities
Fuel
397.4 LReference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
283 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
285 cmReference
Weight
7924 kgReference
2WD Length
467 cmReference
4WD Length
481 cmReference
Height (cab)
302 cmReference
4WD Operating weight
7924 kgReference
Rear axle
104 by 2844 mmReference
4WD Front tread
152 to 223 cmReference
Rear tread
152 to 223 cmReference
Front tire
420/85R28Reference
Rear tire
520/85R28Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 420/85R28. Rear: 520/85R28Reference
Bar rear axle
2489 mmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
120Reference
200Reference
Battery CCA
1300Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Battery AH
176Reference
Test results
Fuel use
39.4 l/hourReference
Max pull
7922 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)