Compare/CaseIH Puma 165 X vs CaseIH Puma 170
Search

CaseIH Puma 165 X vs CaseIH Puma 170

Verdict: CaseIH Puma 165 X vs CaseIH Puma 170

The CaseIH Puma 165 X and the CaseIH Puma 170 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Puma 170 leads on rated power with 167 hp against 165 hp. CaseIH Puma 165 X is the newer design (2018 vs 2011). In short: choose the CaseIH Puma 170 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Puma 165 X if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH Puma 165 X Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH Puma 170 Tractor
CaseIH
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
165 hp
167 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
liquid-cooledReference
Adds transport gear to the power shift, providing road speed at reduced engine RPMs.Reference
Differential lock
rear standardReference
Trailer brakes
pneumaticReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
330.1 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
48.1 LReference
50.0 LReference
Engine (gross)
123.0 kWReference
124.5 kWReference
Engine (max)
134.2 kWReference
162.6 kWReference
Displacement
6.7 LReference
6.7 LReference
Bore/Stroke
104 x 132 mmReference
104 x 132 mmReference
Emissions
Stage IVReference
Interim Tier 4Reference
Rated Power (gross)
123.0 kWReference
124.5 kWReference
Maximum Power (gross)
134.2 kWReference
162.6 kWReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Torque
770.2 NmReference
Torque RPM
1500Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Drawbar (tested)
99.0 kWReference
Emission control
selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Oil capacity
15.1 LReference
Max power
99.0 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
112.5 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
19 forward and 6 reverseReference
infinite forward and reverseReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
Transmission
EconoGearReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Type
partial power shiftReference
continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference
Pressure
210.0 barReference
Rear valves
4Reference
3 to 5 (electronic)Reference
Mid valves
3Reference
Pump flow
110.1 lpmReference
151.4 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IIReference
2/3NReference
Control
electronic draft controlReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
6616 kgReference
Front lift
3571 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000/1000E (1.375)Reference
1000/1000EReference
Engine RPM
1000@1895Reference
Front PTO Type
1000Reference
PTO (claimed)
100.7 kWReference
PTO (tested)
128.4 kWReference
Hydraulic system
83.3 LReference
Capacity
83.3 LReference
Total flow
215.7 lpmReference
Steering flow
64.3 lpmReference
Rear lift
6078 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
127.4 kWReference
Dimensions
Front tire
420/85R28Reference
Rear tire
520/85R28Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 420/85R28. Rear: 520/85R28Reference
Bar rear axle
2489 mmReference
104 by 3022 mmReference
Wheelbase
288 cmReference
Weight
8500 kgReference
Operating weight
8500 kgReference
Front tread
152 to 223 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
200Reference
200Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Battery CCA
1300Reference
Capacities
Fuel
393.6 LReference
CaseIH Puma 170 attachments
Attachment overview
Test results
Fuel use
33.7 l/hourReference
Max pull
7804 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)