Compare/CaseIH Puma 210 vs CaseIH Puma 225

CaseIH Puma 210 vs CaseIH Puma 225

Verdict: CaseIH Puma 210 vs CaseIH Puma 225

The CaseIH Puma 210 and the CaseIH Puma 225 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Puma 225 leads on rated power with 195 hp against 190 hp. CaseIH Puma 225 is the lighter machine (7,484 kg vs 15,708 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Puma 225 is the newer design (2009 vs 2007). In short: choose the CaseIH Puma 225 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Puma 210 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

190 hp

195 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

CVT first available on the Puma 210 starting in late 2008Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Factories

St. Valentin, AustriaReference

—

Original price

$143,661 (2010)Reference

—

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Trailer brakes

hydraulic optionalReference

Engine

156.6 kWReference

167.8 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

116.2 kWReference

—

Displacement

6.7 LReference

Bore/Stroke

104 x 132 mmReference

Emissions

Tier 3Reference

Power

156.6 kWReference

167.8 kWReference

Fuel system

electronic high-pressure common railReference

—

Cooling system

viscous fanReference

—

Air cleaner

dual paper elements with aspiratorReference

—

Compression

16.5:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

15.1 LReference

—

Max power

116.2 kWReference

—

Power at rated engine speed

142.0 kWReference

—

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

infinite forward and reverseReference

Transmission

EconoGearReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

134.2 kWReference

145.4 kWReference

PTO (tested)

151.4 kWReference

—

Hydraulic system

100.3 LReference

Type

continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference

Capacity

100.3 LReference

Valves

3 to 5Reference

Pump flow

170.3 lpmReference

Total flow

234.7 lpmReference

Steering flow

64.3 lpmReference

Rear Type

II/IIINReference

2/3NReference

Rear lift (at ends)

7199 kgReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

6168 kgReference

Front Hitch

optionalReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000/1000E (with CVT)Reference

1000/1000EReference

Front PTO

optionalReference

Front PTO Type

1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

148.0 kWReference

—

Capacities

Fuel

405.0 LReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

288 cmReference

Weight

15708 to 17915 poundsReference

7484 kgReference

Front tire

16.9R30Reference

Rear tire

20.8R42Reference

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 16.9R30. Rear: 20.8R42Reference

Height (cab)

304 cmReference

Height (exhaust)

311 cmReference

Shipping weight

7125 kgReference

7484 kgReference

Operating weight

8126 kgReference

—

Rear axle

104 by 3022 mmReference

CaseIH Puma 210 attachments

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

150Reference

Battery CCA

1300Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

44.3 l/hourReference

—

Max pull

7089 kgReference

—

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.