Compare/CaseIH Puma 215 vs CaseIH Puma 240

CaseIH Puma 215 vs CaseIH Puma 240

Verdict: CaseIH Puma 215 vs CaseIH Puma 240

The CaseIH Puma 215 and the CaseIH Puma 240 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Puma 215 leads on rated power with 215 hp against 212 hp. CaseIH Puma 240 is the lighter machine (7,620 kg vs 8,110 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Puma 240 is the newer design (2014 vs 2011). In short: choose the CaseIH Puma 215 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Puma 240 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

215 hp

212 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Adds transport gear to the power shift, providing road speed at reduced engine RPMs.Reference

Pull at 7.5 KPHReference

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

—

Trailer brakes

—

pneumaticReference

Engine

Engine (gross)

160.3 kWReference

—

Engine (max)

193.9 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

127.6 kWReference

129.2 kWReference

Displacement

6.7 LReference

Bore/Stroke

104 x 132 mmReference

Emissions

Interim Tier 4Reference

Tier 4Reference

Emission control

selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference

Rated Power (gross)

160.3 kWReference

—

Maximum Power (gross)

193.9 kWReference

—

Air cleaner

dual paper elementsReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter

electricReference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

15.1 LReference

—

Max power

127.6 kWReference

129.2 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

142.9 kWReference

157.7 kWReference

Fuel tank

—

389.9 LReference

Engine

—

179.0 kWReference

Power

—

179.0 kWReference

Maximum Power

—

201.3 kWReference

Fuel system

—

electronic common railReference

Cooling system

—

reversibleReference

Transmission

Gears

infinite forward and reverseReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulic wet discReference

—

Transmission

EconoGearReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

134.2 kWReference

152.9 kWReference

PTO (tested)

156.9 kWReference

170.5 kWReference

Hydraulic system

83.3 LReference

—

Type

continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference

Capacity

83.3 LReference

—

Rear valves

3 to 5 (electronic)Reference

—

Pump flow

151.4 lpmReference

149.9 lpmReference

Total flow

215.7 lpmReference

214.2 lpmReference

Steering flow

64.3 lpmReference

Rear Type

2/3NReference

II/IIINReference

Rear lift

6078 kgReference

6804 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000/1000EReference

1000/1000E (1.75)Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

156.0 kWReference

169.8 kWReference

Valves

—

3 to 5Reference

Capacities

Fuel

393.6 LReference

—

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

50.0 LReference

48.1 LReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

288 cmReference

Weight

8110 kgReference

7620 kgReference

Operating weight

8110 kgReference

—

Bar rear axle

104 by 3022 mmReference

—

Front tread

152 to 223 cmReference

—

Front tire

—

420/85R30Reference

Rear tire

—

520/85R42Reference

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 420/85R30. Rear: 520/85R42Reference

Max weight

—

13000 kgReference

CaseIH Puma 215 attachments

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

200Reference

150Reference

Battery CCA

1300Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Attachment overview

Test results

Fuel use

39.7 l/hourReference

46.9 l/hourReference

Max pull

7409 kgReference

8201 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.