Compare/CaseIH Puma 220 vs CaseIH Puma 225

CaseIH Puma 220 vs CaseIH Puma 225

Verdict: CaseIH Puma 220 vs CaseIH Puma 225

The CaseIH Puma 220 and the CaseIH Puma 225 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Puma 225 leads on rated power with 195 hp against 193 hp. CaseIH Puma 225 is the lighter machine (7,484 kg vs 15,900 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Puma 220 is the newer design (2014 vs 2009). In short: choose the CaseIH Puma 225 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Puma 220 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

193 hp

195 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Pull at 7.0 KPHReference

liquid-cooledReference

Original price

$195,731 (2015 power shift )Reference

—

Trailer brakes

pneumaticReference

hydraulic optionalReference

Engine

Fuel tank

389.9 LReference

—

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

48.1 LReference

—

Engine

164.1 kWReference

167.8 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

116.7 kWReference

—

Power shift

7212 kgReference

—

Displacement

6.7 LReference

Bore/Stroke

104 x 132 mmReference

Emissions

Tier 4Reference

Tier 3Reference

Emission control

selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference

—

Power

164.1 kWReference

167.8 kWReference

Maximum Power

193.9 kWReference

—

Fuel system

electronic common railReference

—

Cooling system

reversibleReference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter

electricReference

Starter volts

12Reference

Max power

116.7 kWReference

—

Power at rated engine speed

143.6 kWReference

—

Transmission

Gears

infinite forward and reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

141.7 kWReference

145.4 kWReference

PTO (tested)

156.3 kWReference

—

Type

continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference

Valves

3 to 5Reference

Pump flow

149.9 lpmReference

170.3 lpmReference

Total flow

214.2 lpmReference

234.7 lpmReference

Steering flow

64.3 lpmReference

Rear Type

II/IIINReference

2/3NReference

Rear lift

6804 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000/1000E (1.75)Reference

1000/1000EReference

Power at rated PTO speed

153.5 kWReference

—

Hydraulic system

—

100.3 LReference

Capacity

—

100.3 LReference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

7199 kgReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

6168 kgReference

Front Hitch

—

optionalReference

Front PTO

—

optionalReference

Front PTO Type

—

1000Reference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

288 cmReference

Weight

15900 to 16800 poundsReference

7484 kgReference

Front tire

420/85R30Reference

16.9R30Reference

Rear tire

520/85R42Reference

20.8R42Reference

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 420/85R30. Rear: 520/85R42Reference

Front: 16.9R30. Rear: 20.8R42Reference

CVT

7620 kgReference

—

Height (cab)

—

304 cmReference

Height (exhaust)

—

311 cmReference

Shipping weight

—

7484 kgReference

Rear axle

—

104 by 3022 mmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

150Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery CCA

—

1300Reference

Capacities

Max capacity

13000 kgReference

—

Fuel

—

405.0 LReference

Test results

Fuel use

40.9 l/hourReference

—

Max pull

8067 kgReference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.