Compare/CaseIH Puma 230 vs CaseIH STX275

CaseIH Puma 230 vs CaseIH STX275

Verdict: CaseIH Puma 230 vs CaseIH STX275

The CaseIH Puma 230 and the CaseIH STX275 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH STX275 leads on rated power with 239 hp against 231 hp. CaseIH Puma 230 is the lighter machine (8,981 kg vs 14,417 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Puma 230 is the newer design (2011 vs 2000). In short: choose the CaseIH STX275 for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Puma 230 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

231 hp

239 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Pull at 5.0 KPHReference

Gear 4 used for power test.Reference

Steering

hydrostatic powerReference

Final drives

—

inboard planetaryReference

Engine

Engine (gross)

172.3 kWReference

—

Engine (max)

200.6 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

123.2 kWReference

157.8 kWReference

Displacement

6.7 LReference

8.3 LReference

Bore/Stroke

104 x 132 mmReference

114 x 135 mmReference

Emissions

Interim Tier 4Reference

—

Emission control

selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference

—

Rated Power (gross)

172.3 kWReference

—

Maximum Power (gross)

200.6 kWReference

—

Air cleaner

dual paper elementsReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

2000Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

15.1 LReference

23.8 LReference

Max power

123.2 kWReference

157.8 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

146.1 kWReference

178.2 kWReference

Fuel tank

—

757.0 LReference

Engine

—

205.1 kWReference

Drawbar (claimed)

—

152.9 kWReference

Power

—

205.1 kWReference

Compression

—

17.1:1Reference

Torque

—

1385.8 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1400Reference

Transmission

Gears

infinite forward and reverseReference

24 forward and 6 reverseReference

Clutch

—

electro-hydraulic wet discReference

Transmission

—

SynchroshiftReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

145.4 kWReference

167.8 kWReference

PTO (tested)

162.9 kWReference

204.4 kWReference

Hydraulic system

83.3 LReference

—

Type

continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference

fully synchronizedReference

Capacity

83.3 LReference

—

Rear valves

3 to 5Reference

4 to 7Reference

Pump flow

151.4 lpmReference

—

Total flow

215.7 lpmReference

208.2 lpmReference

Steering flow

64.3 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

2/3NReference

IVN/IIIReference

Rear lift

6078 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000/1000EReference

1000 (1.75)Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

160.0 kWReference

—

SCV flow

—

132.5 lpmReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

6577 kgReference

Capacities

Fuel

393.6 LReference

—

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

50.0 LReference

—

Max capacity

—

14968 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

288 cmReference

368 cmReference

Weight

8981 kgReference

14417 kgReference

Operating weight

8981 kgReference

—

Bar rear axle

104 by 3022 mmReference

—

Front tread

152 to 223 cmReference

—

Length

—

750 cmReference

Width

—

92 cmReference

Height

—

368 cmReference

Front axle

—

101 mmReference

Rear axle

—

101 mmReference

Rear tread

—

152 to 447 cmReference

Operating

—

14417 kgReference

Max Drawbar

—

4989 kgReference

CaseIH Puma 230 attachments

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

200Reference

—

Battery CCA

1300Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Attachment overview

Test results

Fuel use

42.8 l/hourReference

51.9 l/hourReference

Max pull

8278 kgReference

—

Variants

TJ275

—