Compare/CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac vs CaseIH STX440

CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac vs CaseIH STX440

Verdict: CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac vs CaseIH STX440

The CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac and the CaseIH STX440 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac leads on rated power with 402 hp against 401 hp. CaseIH STX440 is the lighter machine (17,837 kg vs 53,554 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac holds more fuel (1173.4 L vs 1135.5 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac is the newer design (2011 vs 2001). In short: choose the CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH STX440 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

402 hp

401 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference

Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference

Drive

articulated crawlerReference

—

Final drives

—

compound planetaryReference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Variants

450

wheeled tractorReference

—

450QT

crawler tractorReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

1173.4 LReference

1135.5 LReference

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

242.2 LReference

—

Engine

335.6 kWReference

328.1 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

261.9 kWReference

276.9 kWReference

Displacement

12.9 LReference

14.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

135 x 150 mmReference

137 x 169 mmReference

Emissions

Interim Tier 4Reference

—

Emission control

selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference

—

Power

335.6 kWReference

328.1 kWReference

Maximum Power

369.1 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2100Reference

2000Reference

Max power

261.9 kWReference

276.9 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

300.1 kWReference

298.8 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

—

16.5:1Reference

Torque

—

2237.4 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1400Reference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and 2 reverseReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulic wet discsReference

electro-hydraulic wet discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

287.1 kWReference

—

PTO (tested)

339.3 kWReference

338.7 kWReference

Type

full power shiftReference

Rear valves

4 to 8Reference

4 to 7Reference

Pump flow

132.5 lpmReference

208.2 lpmReference

Total flow

427.7 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

4NReference

IVNReference

Rear lift

8948 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000 (1-3/4)Reference

1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

323.1 kWReference

—

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

8845 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

391 cmReference

Weight

53554 to 54290 poundsReference

17837 kgReference

Operating

24625 kgReference

17837 kgReference

Ballasted

25401 kgReference

20212 kgReference

Front tire

—

20.8R42Reference

Rear tire

—

20.8R42Reference

Ag front

—

20.8R42Reference

Ag rear

—

20.8R42Reference

Width

—

111 cmReference

Rear axle

—

114 mmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

200Reference

—

Batteries

2Reference

Battery CCA

1000Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

86.7 l/hourReference

82.5 l/hourReference

Max pull

21781 kgReference

20196 kgReference

Capacities

Max capacity

—

23950 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.