Compare/CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac vs CaseIH STX440QT Quadtrac
Search

CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac vs CaseIH STX440QT Quadtrac

Verdict: CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac vs CaseIH STX440QT Quadtrac

The CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac and the CaseIH STX440QT Quadtrac are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac leads on rated power with 402 hp against 399 hp. CaseIH STX440QT Quadtrac is the lighter machine (23,285 kg vs 53,554 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac holds more fuel (1173.4 L vs 1135.5 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac is the newer design (2011 vs 2001). In short: choose the CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH STX440QT Quadtrac if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH STX440QT Quadtrac Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
402 hp
399 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Gear 4 used for power test.Reference
Drive
articulated crawlerReference
articulated crawlerReference
Final drives
inboard planetaryReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Variants
450
wheeled tractorReference
450QT
crawler tractorReference
Engine
Fuel tank
1173.4 LReference
1135.5 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
242.2 LReference
Engine
335.6 kWReference
328.1 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
261.9 kWReference
257.8 kWReference
Displacement
12.9 LReference
14.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
135 x 150 mmReference
137 x 169 mmReference
Emissions
Interim Tier 4Reference
Emission control
selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
Power
335.6 kWReference
328.1 kWReference
Maximum Power
369.1 kWReference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2000Reference
Max power
261.9 kWReference
257.8 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
300.1 kWReference
297.6 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
16.5:1Reference
Torque
2237.4 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
Transmission
Gears
16 forward and 2 reverseReference
16 forward and 2 reverseReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discsReference
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
287.1 kWReference
PTO (tested)
339.3 kWReference
335.8 kWReference
Type
full power shiftReference
full power shiftReference
Rear valves
4 to 8Reference
4 to 7Reference
Pump flow
132.5 lpmReference
208.2 lpmReference
Total flow
427.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
4NReference
IVNReference
Rear lift
8948 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1-3/4)Reference
1000Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
323.1 kWReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
8845 kgReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
391 cmReference
Weight
53554 to 54290 poundsReference
23285 kgReference
Operating
24625 kgReference
Ballasted
25401 kgReference
Width
111 cmReference
Operating weight
23285 kgReference
Max weight
24160 kgReference
Rear axle
114 mmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
200Reference
Batteries
2Reference
2Reference
Battery CCA
1000Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
86.7 l/hourReference
83.6 l/hourReference
Max pull
21781 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)