Compare/CaseIH Steiger 485 vs CaseIH Steiger 500 Quadtrac
Search

CaseIH Steiger 485 vs CaseIH Steiger 500 Quadtrac

Verdict: CaseIH Steiger 485 vs CaseIH Steiger 500 Quadtrac

The CaseIH Steiger 485 and the CaseIH Steiger 500 Quadtrac are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Steiger 500 Quadtrac leads on rated power with 451 hp against 444 hp. CaseIH Steiger 485 is the lighter machine (17,463 kg vs 53,554 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Steiger 500 Quadtrac holds more fuel (1173.4 L vs 1135.5 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Steiger 500 Quadtrac is the newer design (2011 vs 2008). In short: choose the CaseIH Steiger 500 Quadtrac for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Steiger 485 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CaseIH Steiger 485 Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
CaseIH Steiger 500 Quadtrac Tractor
CaseIH
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
444 hp
451 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CaseIHReference
CaseIHReference
Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Original price
$291,250 (2010)Reference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Drive
articulated crawlerReference
Variants
500
wheeled tractorReference
485 Quadtrac
articulted crawlerReference
500QT
crawler tractorReference
Engine
Fuel tank
1135.5 LReference
1173.4 LReference
Engine
361.7 kWReference
372.9 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
298.6 kWReference
286.9 kWReference
Displacement
12.9 LReference
12.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
135 x 150 mmReference
135 x 150 mmReference
Emissions
Tier 3Reference
Interim Tier 4Reference
Power
361.7 kWReference
372.9 kWReference
Maximum Power
398.2 kWReference
410.1 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
16.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
2000Reference
2100Reference
Starter volts
24Reference
Oil capacity
31.0 LReference
Max power
298.6 kWReference
286.9 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
330.9 kWReference
336.1 kWReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
242.2 LReference
Emission control
selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
Transmission
Gears
16 forward and 2 reverseReference
16 forward and 2 reverseReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discsReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
319.9 kWReference
320.7 kWReference
PTO (tested)
371.6 kWReference
376.3 kWReference
Type
full power shiftReference
full power shiftReference
Valves
4 to 9 (without 3-point hitch)Reference
Total flow
340.7 lpmReference
427.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
4NReference
4NReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
8899 kgReference
Rear PTO
independent optionalReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
1000 (1-3/4)Reference
Rear valves
4 to 8Reference
Pump flow
132.5 lpmReference
Rear lift
8948 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
365.2 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
391 cmReference
391 cmReference
Weight
17463 kgReference
53554 to 54290 poundsReference
Front tire
710/70R42Reference
Rear tire
710/70R42Reference
Ag front
710/70R42Reference
Ag rear
710/70R42Reference
Width
111 cmReference
Shipping weight
17463 kgReference
Max weight
24494 kgReference
Front axle
114 mmReference
Rear axle
114 mmReference
Operating
24625 kgReference
Ballasted
25401 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
175Reference
200Reference
Batteries
2Reference
2Reference
Battery CCA
1000Reference
1000Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
93.5 l/hourReference
94.6 l/hourReference
Max pull
19874 kgReference
22750 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)