Compare/CaseIH Steiger 535 vs CaseIH Steiger 550 Quadtrac

CaseIH Steiger 535 vs CaseIH Steiger 550 Quadtrac

Verdict: CaseIH Steiger 535 vs CaseIH Steiger 550 Quadtrac

The CaseIH Steiger 535 and the CaseIH Steiger 550 Quadtrac are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. CaseIH Steiger 550 Quadtrac leads on rated power with 474 hp against 473 hp. CaseIH Steiger 535 is the lighter machine (19,341 kg vs 24,405 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. CaseIH Steiger 550 Quadtrac holds more fuel (1779.0 L vs 1135.5 L) for longer stints between fills. CaseIH Steiger 550 Quadtrac is the newer design (2011 vs 2008). In short: choose the CaseIH Steiger 550 Quadtrac for outright pulling power, or the CaseIH Steiger 535 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

CaseIH

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

473 hp

474 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

CaseIHReference

liquid-cooledReference

Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference

Original price

$318,437 (2010)Reference

—

Drive

—

articulated crawlerReference

Variants

550

—

wheeled tractorReference

535 Quadtrac

articulated crawlerReference

—

550QT

—

crawler tractorReference

Engine

Fuel tank

1135.5 LReference

1779.0 LReference

Engine

398.9 kWReference

410.1 kWReference

Displacement

15.0 LReference

12.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

137 x 169 mmReference

135 x 150 mmReference

Emissions

Tier 3Reference

Interim Tier 4Reference

Power

398.9 kWReference

410.1 kWReference

Maximum Power

439.2 kWReference

451.1 kWReference

Compression

17:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2100Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

24Reference

—

Oil capacity

49.2 LReference

—

Exhaust fluid (DEF)

—

242.2 LReference

Drawbar (tested)

—

323.8 kWReference

Emission control

—

selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference

Max power

—

323.8 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

353.8 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and 2 reverseReference

Clutch

—

electro-hydraulic wet discsReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

352.7 kWReference

354.2 kWReference

Type

full power shiftReference

Valves

4 to 9 (without 3-point hitch)Reference

—

Total flow

355.8 lpmReference

427.7 lpmReference

Rear Type

4NReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

8899 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independent optionalReference

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

1000 (1-3/4)Reference

PTO (tested)

—

399.5 kWReference

Rear valves

—

4 to 8Reference

Pump flow

—

132.5 lpmReference

Rear lift

—

8948 kgReference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

385.8 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

391 cmReference

Weight

19341 kgReference

24405 kgReference

Front tire

800/70R38Reference

—

Rear tire

800/70R38Reference

—

Ag front

800/70R38Reference

—

Ag rear

800/70R38Reference

—

Width

111 cmReference

—

Front axle

114 mmReference

—

Rear axle

114 mmReference

—

Shipping

19341 kgReference

—

Max Drawbar

4989 kgReference

—

Ballasted weight

—

25401 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

200Reference

Batteries

2Reference

Battery CCA

1000Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Capacities

Max capacity

24494 kgReference

—

Test results

Fuel use

—

104.1 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

23789 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.