Search
CBT 1020 vs Saukville Saukville
Verdict: CBT 1020 vs Saukville Saukville
The CBT 1020 and the Saukville Saukville are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Saukville Saukville is the lighter machine (1,134 kg vs 3,969 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
CBT
79
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Saukville
79
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
null hp
null hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
CBTReference
SaukvilleReference
liquid-cooledReference
Open operator station.Reference
Steering
—
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Rated RPM
2000Reference
—
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
PTO & Hydraulics
Rear PTO Type
540Reference
—
Hydraulic system
—
56.8 LReference
Capacity
—
56.8 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
202 cmReference
213 cmReference
Weight
3969 kgReference
1134 kgReference
Rear tire
15x34Reference
8.3x24Reference
Ag rear
15x34Reference
9.5x24Reference
Length
360 cmReference
366 cmReference
Width
215 cmReference
—
Height
184 cmReference
—
Operating weight
3969 kgReference
—
Ballasted weight
4921 kgReference
—
Front tread
151 cmReference
—
Rear tread
167 cmReference
101 to 182 cmReference
Front tire
—
5.00x12Reference
Ag front
—
5.00x12Reference
Transmission
Type
—
hydrostaticReference
Gears
—
infinite forward and reverse (2-range)Reference
Capacities
Fuel
—
37.9 LReference
Electrical
Ground
—
negativeReference
Battery volts
—
12Reference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.