Search
Centaur CI-MA3 vs Massey Ferguson 765
Verdict: Centaur CI-MA3 vs Massey Ferguson 765
The Centaur CI-MA3 and the Massey Ferguson 765 are both industrial tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Centaur
79
Fit score
Clear
Massey Ferguson
88
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
null hp
null hp
Confidence
40%
98%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
Centaur (a part of Le Roi)Reference
Massey FergusonReference
liquid-cooledReference
liquid-cooledReference
Steering
manualReference
—
Engine
Rated RPM
1400Reference
2000Reference
Displacement
—
3.1 LReference
Bore/Stroke
—
89 x 127 mmReference
Transmission
Type
gearReference
—
Gears
4 forward and 1 reverseReference
—
Dimensions
Weight
1360 kgReference
—
Front tire
5.00x15Reference
—
Rear tire
9x24Reference
—
Industrial front
5.00x15Reference
—
Industrial rear
9x24Reference
—
Operating weight
1360 kgReference
—
Centaur CI-MA3 attachments
765 Serial Numbers
1958
—
500001Reference
1959
—
510451Reference
1960
—
520569Reference
1961
—
533180Reference
1962
—
551733Reference
1963
—
572325Reference
1964
—
593028Reference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.