Compare/Challenger 35 vs Challenger MT635
Search

Challenger 35 vs Challenger MT635

Verdict: Challenger 35 vs Challenger MT635

The Challenger 35 and the Challenger MT635 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger 35 leads on rated power with 175 hp against 164 hp. Challenger MT635 is the lighter machine (8,573 kg vs 10,098 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger MT635 holds more fuel (454.2 L vs 321.7 L) for longer stints between fills. Challenger MT635 is the newer design (2002 vs 1995). In short: choose the Challenger 35 for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT635 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger 35 Tractor
Challenger
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger MT635 Tractor
Challenger
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
175 hp
164 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
liquid-cooledReference
PTO performanceReference
Drive
crawlerReference
Steering
differential powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
473.1 LReference
454.2 LReference
Engine
156.6 kWReference
Drawbar (claimed)
111.9 kWReference
Displacement
6.6 LReference
7.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
105 x 127 mmReference
108 x 134 mmReference
Power
156.6 kWReference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
32.6 LReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
16.5:1Reference
Max power
130.2 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
122.6 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
32 forward and 18 reverseReference
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
130.5 kWReference
119.3 kWReference
Type
creeperReference
power shiftReference
Pressure
189.6 barReference
200.0 barReference
Valves
3 or 4Reference
4Reference
Pump flow
118.1 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IIReference
IIIReference
Control
draft controlReference
Rear lift
6804 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1.75)Reference
540/1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@1900Reference
1000@2091Reference
PTO (tested)
130.2 kWReference
Total flow
147.6 lpmReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
7302 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
127.8 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
218 cmReference
307 cmReference
Weight
10098 kgReference
8573 kgReference
Length
535 cmReference
515 cmReference
Height (cab)
304 cmReference
307 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
317 cmReference
Gauge
152/172/182/193/203/223/228 cmReference
Front tire
14.9R30Reference
Rear tire
18.4R42Reference
Ag front
14.9R30Reference
Ag rear
18.4R42Reference
Shipping weight
8573 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Challenger 35 Tracks
Width
231 cmReference
249 cmReference
Test results
Fuel use
38.6 l/hourReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)