Compare/Challenger 55 vs Challenger MT655B
Search

Challenger 55 vs Challenger MT655B

Verdict: Challenger 55 vs Challenger MT655B

The Challenger 55 and the Challenger MT655B are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 225 hp. Challenger 55 is the lighter machine (11,793 kg vs 19,550 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger MT655B is the newer design (2005 vs 1996). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger 55 Tractor
Challenger
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger MT655B Tractor
Challenger
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
225 hp
225 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Pull at 3.7 KPHReference
Drive
crawlerReference
Steering
differential powerReference
Final drives
inboard planetaryReference
Differential lock
electrohydraulic front and rearReference
Trailer brakes
hydraulicReference
Engine
Fuel tank
473.1 LReference
Drawbar (claimed)
142.4 kWReference
Displacement
7.2 LReference
8.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
110 x 127 mmReference
111 x 145 mmReference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
32.6 LReference
33.7 LReference
Engine
193.9 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
160.8 kWReference
Power
193.9 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Pre-heating
1000W coolant heaterReference
Compression
17.5:1Reference
Oil capacity
67.0 LReference
Max power
160.8 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
167.6 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
32 forward and 18 reverseReference
infinite forward and reverse (2-range)Reference
Transmission
TechStarReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
167.8 kWReference
164.1 kWReference
Type
creeperReference
continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference
Pressure
189.6 barReference
200.0 barReference
Valves
3 or 4Reference
4 to 6Reference
Pump flow
208.2 lpmReference
Rear Type
III/IIReference
IIIReference
Control
draft controlReference
Rear lift
6804 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1.75)Reference
1000 (1.75)Reference
Engine RPM
1000@1900Reference
1000@2031Reference
PTO (tested)
188.2 kWReference
Hydraulic system
99.9 LReference
Capacity
99.9 LReference
Total flow
147.6 lpmReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
7076 kgReference
Front Hitch
IIReference
Front lift
5488 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
184.5 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
218 cmReference
307 cmReference
Weight
11793 kgReference
19550 to 20290 poundsReference
Length
535 cmReference
523 cmReference
Height (cab)
304 cmReference
313 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
317 cmReference
Gauge
152/172/182/193/203/223/228 cmReference
Front tire
380/85R34Reference
Rear tire
480/80R46Reference
Ag front
380/85R34Reference
Ag rear
480/80R46Reference
Ground clearance
56 cmReference
Bar rear axle
109 by 2997 mmReference
Rear tread
152 to 223 cmReference
Shipping
8867 kgReference
Operating
9203 kgReference
Ballasted
12056 kgReference
Max Drawbar
2549 kgReference
Max front axle
4926 kgReference
Max rear axle
7731 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging amps
150Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery CCA
775Reference
Challenger 55 Tracks
Width
231 cmReference
299 cmReference
Capacities
Fuel
601.8 LReference
Test results
Fuel use
51.1 l/hourReference
Max pull
11165 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)