Search
Challenger 55 vs Challenger MT655B
Verdict: Challenger 55 vs Challenger MT655B
The Challenger 55 and the Challenger MT655B are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 225 hp. Challenger 55 is the lighter machine (11,793 kg vs 19,550 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger MT655B is the newer design (2005 vs 1996). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
225 hp
225 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Pull at 3.7 KPHReference
Drive
crawlerReference
—
Steering
differential powerReference
—
Final drives
—
inboard planetaryReference
Differential lock
—
electrohydraulic front and rearReference
Trailer brakes
—
hydraulicReference
Engine
Fuel tank
473.1 LReference
—
Drawbar (claimed)
142.4 kWReference
—
Displacement
7.2 LReference
8.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
110 x 127 mmReference
111 x 145 mmReference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
32.6 LReference
33.7 LReference
Engine
—
193.9 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
—
160.8 kWReference
Power
—
193.9 kWReference
Air cleaner
—
dual paper elementsReference
Pre-heating
—
1000W coolant heaterReference
Compression
—
17.5:1Reference
Oil capacity
—
67.0 LReference
Max power
—
160.8 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
—
167.6 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
32 forward and 18 reverseReference
infinite forward and reverse (2-range)Reference
Transmission
—
TechStarReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
167.8 kWReference
164.1 kWReference
Type
creeperReference
continuously variable transmission (CVT)Reference
Pressure
189.6 barReference
200.0 barReference
Valves
3 or 4Reference
4 to 6Reference
Pump flow
208.2 lpmReference
—
Rear Type
III/IIReference
IIIReference
Control
draft controlReference
—
Rear lift
6804 kgReference
—
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1.75)Reference
1000 (1.75)Reference
Engine RPM
1000@1900Reference
1000@2031Reference
PTO (tested)
—
188.2 kWReference
Hydraulic system
—
99.9 LReference
Capacity
—
99.9 LReference
Total flow
—
147.6 lpmReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
—
7076 kgReference
Front Hitch
—
IIReference
Front lift
—
5488 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
—
184.5 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
218 cmReference
307 cmReference
Weight
11793 kgReference
19550 to 20290 poundsReference
Length
535 cmReference
523 cmReference
Height (cab)
304 cmReference
313 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
317 cmReference
—
Gauge
152/172/182/193/203/223/228 cmReference
—
Front tire
—
380/85R34Reference
Rear tire
—
480/80R46Reference
Ag front
—
380/85R34Reference
Ag rear
—
480/80R46Reference
Ground clearance
—
56 cmReference
Bar rear axle
—
109 by 2997 mmReference
Rear tread
—
152 to 223 cmReference
Shipping
—
8867 kgReference
Operating
—
9203 kgReference
Ballasted
—
12056 kgReference
Max Drawbar
—
2549 kgReference
Max front axle
—
4926 kgReference
Max rear axle
—
7731 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging amps
—
150Reference
Batteries
—
2Reference
Battery CCA
—
775Reference
Challenger 55 Tracks
Width
231 cmReference
299 cmReference
Capacities
Fuel
—
601.8 LReference
Test results
Fuel use
—
51.1 l/hourReference
Max pull
—
11165 kgReference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.


