Compare/Challenger 65D vs Challenger 85E
Search

Challenger 65D vs Challenger 85E

Verdict: Challenger 65D vs Challenger 85E

The Challenger 65D and the Challenger 85E are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger 85E leads on rated power with 303 hp against 300 hp. Challenger 85E is the lighter machine (15,828 kg vs 15,982 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger 85E holds more fuel (1059.8 L vs 791.1 L) for longer stints between fills. Challenger 85E is the newer design (1998 vs 1995). In short: choose the Challenger 85E for outright pulling power, or the Challenger 65D if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger 65D Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger 85E Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
300 hp
303 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference
Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Drive
crawlerReference
crawlerReference
Steering
hydrostatic differential steeringReference
hydrostatic differential steeringReference
Original price
$224,000Reference
Engine
Fuel tank
791.1 LReference
1059.8 LReference
Engine (gross)
223.7 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
175.4 kWReference
221.1 kWReference
Displacement
10.4 LReference
11.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
121 x 152 mmReference
130 x 150 mmReference
Power (gross)
223.7 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elements with aspiratorReference
dual paper elements with aspiratorReference
Pre-heating
block heaterReference
Compression
15:1Reference
16:1Reference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2100Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
41.6 LReference
75.7 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
191.0 kWReference
226.1 kWReference
Max power
175.4 kWReference
221.1 kWReference
Engine
279.6 kWReference
Power
279.6 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
10 forward and 2 reverseReference
10 forward and 2 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (tested)
191.0 kWReference
250.3 kWReference
Type
full power shiftReference
full power shiftReference
Valves
4Reference
4Reference
Pump flow
132.5 lpmReference
151.4 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
Rear lift
6842 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1.75)Reference
1000Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
200.1 kWReference
227.9 kWReference
PTO (claimed)
225.2 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
271 cmReference
271 cmReference
Weight
15982 kgReference
15828 kgReference
Length
589 cmReference
Height (cab)
325 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
365 cmReference
Operating weight
15982 kgReference
15828 kgReference
Gauge
228 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
145Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Challenger 65D Tracks
Width
304 cmReference
63 cmReference
Test results
Fuel use
60.2 l/hourReference
66.6 l/hourReference
Max pull
16103 kgReference
15454 kgReference
Challenger 85E Tracks

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)