Compare/Challenger 65D vs Challenger MT755B
Search

Challenger 65D vs Challenger MT755B

Verdict: Challenger 65D vs Challenger MT755B

The Challenger 65D and the Challenger MT755B are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger MT755B leads on rated power with 301 hp against 300 hp. Challenger MT755B is the lighter machine (14,095 kg vs 15,982 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger 65D holds more fuel (791.1 L vs 446.6 L) for longer stints between fills. Challenger MT755B is the newer design (2005 vs 1995). In short: choose the Challenger MT755B for outright pulling power, or the Challenger 65D if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger 65D Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger MT755B Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
300 hp
301 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference
Drive
crawlerReference
crawlerReference
Steering
hydrostatic differential steeringReference
electro-hydraulic powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
791.1 LReference
787.3 LReference
Engine (gross)
223.7 kWReference
224.5 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
175.4 kWReference
159.3 kWReference
Displacement
10.4 LReference
8.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
121 x 152 mmReference
112 x 149 mmReference
Power (gross)
223.7 kWReference
224.5 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elements with aspiratorReference
dual paper elementsReference
Pre-heating
block heaterReference
Compression
15:1Reference
17.1:1Reference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2100Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
41.6 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
191.0 kWReference
183.2 kWReference
Max power
175.4 kWReference
159.3 kWReference
Torque
1406.2 NmReference
Torque RPM
1201Reference
Transmission
Gears
10 forward and 2 reverseReference
16 forward and 4 reverseReference
Transmission
Cat PowerShiftReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (tested)
191.0 kWReference
235.6 kWReference
Type
full power shiftReference
full power shiftReference
Valves
4Reference
Pump flow
132.5 lpmReference
164.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
IIIN/IIIReference
Rear lift
6842 kgReference
7257 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1.75)Reference
1000Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
200.1 kWReference
207.0 kWReference
PTO (claimed)
182.7 kWReference
Pressure
200.0 barReference
Rear valves
4 to 6Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
271 cmReference
243 cmReference
Weight
15982 kgReference
14095 kgReference
Length
589 cmReference
591 cmReference
Height (cab)
325 cmReference
344 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
365 cmReference
Operating weight
15982 kgReference
Gauge
228 cmReference
Shipping weight
14095 kgReference
Ground clearance
36 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
145Reference
185Reference
Batteries
2Reference
2Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Battery CCA
1000Reference
Challenger 65D Tracks
Width
304 cmReference
337 cmReference
Test results
Fuel use
60.2 l/hourReference
54.5 l/hourReference
Max pull
16103 kgReference
13729 kgReference
Challenger MT755B Tracks

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)