Compare/Challenger 75 vs Challenger MT755

Challenger 75 vs Challenger MT755

Verdict: Challenger 75 vs Challenger MT755

The Challenger 75 and the Challenger MT755 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger MT755 leads on rated power with 290 hp against 281 hp. Challenger MT755 is the lighter machine (13,399 kg vs 15,590 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger 75 holds more fuel (832.7 L vs 446.6 L) for longer stints between fills. Challenger MT755 is the newer design (2002 vs 1991). In short: choose the Challenger MT755 for outright pulling power, or the Challenger 75 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Challenger

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Challenger

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

281 hp

290 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference

CaterpillarReference

Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference

Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference

Drive

crawlerReference

Steering

hydrostatic differential steeringReference

electro-hydraulicReference

Engine

Fuel tank

832.7 LReference

787.3 LReference

Engine

242.4 kWReference

—

Drawbar (claimed)

193.9 kWReference

168.5 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

187.2 kWReference

151.3 kWReference

Displacement

10.3 LReference

8.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

125 x 140 mmReference

112 x 149 mmReference

Power

242.4 kWReference

—

Compression

16:1Reference

16.0:1Reference

Rated RPM

2100Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Coolant capacity

41.6 LReference

—

Max power

187.2 kWReference

151.3 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

209.8 kWReference

176.6 kWReference

Engine (gross)

—

216.3 kWReference

Power (gross)

—

216.3 kWReference

Air cleaner

—

dual paper elementsReference

Transmission

Gears

10 forward and 2 reverseReference

30 forward and 8 reverseReference

Clutch

—

hydraulic wet discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

209.5 kWReference

175.2 kWReference

PTO (tested)

225.1 kWReference

201.5 kWReference

Type

full power shiftReference

creeperReference

Valves

4Reference

4 to 6Reference

Pump flow

98.4 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

III,IVReference

IIIReference

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

1000 (1.75)Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

212.9 kWReference

191.9 kWReference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Total flow

—

164.6 lpmReference

Rear lift

—

7257 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

269 cmReference

243 cmReference

Weight

15590 kgReference

13399 kgReference

Operating weight

15590 kgReference

—

Bar rear axle

—

4064 mmReference

Gauge

—

304 to 406 cmReference

Challenger 75 Tracks

Width

90 cmReference

—

Length on ground

271 cmReference

—

Area on ground

3.8 m²Reference

—

Ground pressure

0.4 barReference

—

Test results

Fuel use

59.4 l/hourReference

51.1 l/hourReference

Max pull

15562 kgReference

12762 kgReference

MT755 Serial Numbers

2002

—

ALM20000Reference

2003

—

ALM30000Reference

2004

—

ALM40000Reference

Location:

—

On main tractor frame, front left side.Reference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

160Reference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.