Compare/Challenger 75C vs Challenger MT765B

Challenger 75C vs Challenger MT765B

Verdict: Challenger 75C vs Challenger MT765B

The Challenger 75C and the Challenger MT765B are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger 75C leads on rated power with 325 hp against 320 hp. Challenger MT765B is the lighter machine (14,095 kg vs 15,107 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger MT765B is the newer design (2005 vs 1993). In short: choose the Challenger 75C for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT765B if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Challenger

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Challenger

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

325 hp

320 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference

Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference

Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference

Gear 2 used for pull test.Reference

Drive

crawlerReference

Engine

Engine (gross)

242.4 kWReference

238.6 kWReference

Drawbar (claimed)

190.9 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

187.2 kWReference

170.2 kWReference

Displacement

10.3 LReference

8.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

125 x 140 mmReference

112 x 149 mmReference

Power (gross)

242.4 kWReference

238.6 kWReference

Air cleaner

dual dry elementsReference

dual paper elementsReference

Pre-heating

block heaterReference

—

Compression

16:1Reference

17.1:1Reference

Rated RPM

2100Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

56.8 LReference

—

Coolant capacity

56.8 LReference

—

Max power

187.2 kWReference

170.2 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

209.8 kWReference

198.2 kWReference

Fuel tank

—

787.3 LReference

Transmission

Gears

10 forward and 2 reverseReference

16 forward and 4 reverseReference

Transmission

—

Cat PowerShiftReference

Clutch

—

hydraulic wet discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

208.8 kWReference

197.6 kWReference

PTO (tested)

225.1 kWReference

239.2 kWReference

Hydraulic system

109.8 LReference

—

Type

full power shiftReference

Capacity

109.8 LReference

—

Pressure

175.8 barReference

200.0 barReference

Valves

4Reference

—

Pump flow

132.5 lpmReference

164.6 lpmReference

Steering flow

232.4 lpmReference

—

Steering press.

419.9 barReference

—

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

212.9 kWReference

219.8 kWReference

Rear valves

—

4 to 6Reference

Rear Type

—

III/IIINReference

Rear lift

—

7257 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Capacities

Fuel

791.1 LReference

—

Dimensions

Wheelbase

272 cmReference

243 cmReference

Weight

15107 kgReference

14095 kgReference

Length

589 cmReference

591 cmReference

Height (cab)

325 cmReference

344 cmReference

Height (exhaust)

365 cmReference

—

Operating weight

15107 kgReference

—

Clearance (drawbar)

38 cmReference

—

Gauge

228 cmReference

—

Shipping weight

—

14095 kgReference

Ground clearance

—

36 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

115Reference

185Reference

Batteries

2Reference

Battery CCA

900Reference

1000Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Challenger 75C Tracks

Width

304 cmReference

337 cmReference

Length on ground

272 cmReference

—

Area on ground

4.1 m²Reference

—

Ground pressure

0.4 barReference

—

Test results

Fuel use

59.4 l/hourReference

64.3 l/hourReference

Max pull

15562 kgReference

15488 kgReference

MT765B Serial Numbers

2005

—

AMS50000Reference

2006

—

AMS60000Reference

Location:

—

On main tractor frame, front left side.Reference

Challenger MT765B Tracks

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.