Compare/Challenger 75D vs Challenger MT765B
Search

Challenger 75D vs Challenger MT765B

Verdict: Challenger 75D vs Challenger MT765B

The Challenger 75D and the Challenger MT765B are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger 75D leads on rated power with 330 hp against 320 hp. Challenger MT765B is the lighter machine (14,095 kg vs 16,202 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger MT765B is the newer design (2005 vs 1996). In short: choose the Challenger 75D for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT765B if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger 75D Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger MT765B Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
330 hp
320 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Gear 2 used for pull test.Reference
Drive
crawlerReference
crawlerReference
Steering
hydrostatic differential steeringReference
Engine
Engine (gross)
246.1 kWReference
238.6 kWReference
Drawbar (claimed)
179.0 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
189.8 kWReference
170.2 kWReference
Displacement
10.3 LReference
8.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
125 x 140 mmReference
112 x 149 mmReference
Power (gross)
246.1 kWReference
238.6 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elements with aspiratorReference
dual paper elementsReference
Pre-heating
block heaterReference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2100Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
56.8 LReference
Coolant capacity
56.8 LReference
Max power
189.8 kWReference
170.2 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
212.0 kWReference
198.2 kWReference
Fuel tank
787.3 LReference
Compression
17.1:1Reference
Transmission
Gears
10 forward and 2 reverseReference
16 forward and 4 reverseReference
Transmission
Cat PowerShiftReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
212.5 kWReference
197.6 kWReference
PTO (tested)
224.1 kWReference
239.2 kWReference
Hydraulic system
109.8 LReference
Type
full power shiftReference
full power shiftReference
Capacity
109.8 LReference
Pressure
189.6 barReference
200.0 barReference
Valves
4Reference
Pump flow
132.5 lpmReference
164.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
IV/IIIReference
III/IIINReference
Control
position and draft controlReference
Rear lift
5579 kgReference
7257 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1.75)Reference
1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2050Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
218.2 kWReference
219.8 kWReference
Rear valves
4 to 6Reference
Capacities
Fuel
768.4 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
271 cmReference
243 cmReference
Weight
16202 kgReference
14095 kgReference
Length
589 cmReference
591 cmReference
Height (cab)
325 cmReference
344 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
365 cmReference
Operating weight
16202 kgReference
Gauge
228 cmReference
Shipping weight
14095 kgReference
Ground clearance
36 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
145Reference
185Reference
Batteries
2Reference
2Reference
Battery CCA
900Reference
1000Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Challenger 75D Tracks
Width
304 cmReference
337 cmReference
Length on ground
272 cmReference
Area on ground
4.8 m²Reference
Ground pressure
0.3 barReference
Test results
Fuel use
59.8 l/hourReference
64.3 l/hourReference
Max pull
15767 kgReference
15488 kgReference
MT765B Serial Numbers
2005
AMS50000Reference
2006
AMS60000Reference
Location:
On main tractor frame, front left side.Reference
Challenger MT765B Tracks

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)