Compare/Challenger 75E vs Challenger MT755B

Challenger 75E vs Challenger MT755B

Verdict: Challenger 75E vs Challenger MT755B

The Challenger 75E and the Challenger MT755B are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 301 hp. Challenger MT755B is the lighter machine (14,095 kg vs 15,785 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger 75E holds more fuel (1059.8 L vs 446.6 L) for longer stints between fills. Challenger MT755B is the newer design (2005 vs 1998). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Challenger

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Challenger

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

301 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference

Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference

Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference

Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference

Original price

$207,300Reference

—

Drive

crawlerReference

Steering

hydrostatic differential steeringReference

electro-hydraulic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

1059.8 LReference

787.3 LReference

Engine

253.5 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

196.4 kWReference

159.3 kWReference

Displacement

10.3 LReference

8.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

125 x 140 mmReference

112 x 149 mmReference

Power

253.5 kWReference

—

Air cleaner

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

16:1Reference

17.1:1Reference

Rated RPM

2100Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Coolant capacity

56.8 LReference

—

Max power

196.4 kWReference

159.3 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

224.2 kWReference

183.2 kWReference

Engine (gross)

—

224.5 kWReference

Power (gross)

—

224.5 kWReference

Torque

—

1406.2 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1201Reference

Transmission

Gears

10 forward and 2 reverseReference

16 forward and 4 reverseReference

Transmission

—

Cat PowerShiftReference

Clutch

—

hydraulic wet discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (tested)

246.9 kWReference

235.6 kWReference

Type

full power shiftReference

Valves

4Reference

—

Total flow

151.4 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

III,IVReference

IIIN/IIIReference

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

230.9 kWReference

207.0 kWReference

PTO (claimed)

—

182.7 kWReference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Rear valves

—

4 to 6Reference

Pump flow

—

164.6 lpmReference

Rear lift

—

7257 kgReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Dimensions

Weight

15785 kgReference

14095 kgReference

Operating weight

15785 kgReference

—

Wheelbase

—

243 cmReference

Length

—

591 cmReference

Height (cab)

—

344 cmReference

Shipping weight

—

14095 kgReference

Ground clearance

—

36 cmReference

Challenger 75E Tracks

Width

63 cmReference

337 cmReference

Test results

Fuel use

62.5 l/hourReference

54.5 l/hourReference

Max pull

15173 kgReference

13729 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

185Reference

Batteries

—

2Reference

Battery CCA

—

1000Reference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Challenger MT755B Tracks

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.