Compare/Challenger 95E vs Challenger MT755B
Search

Challenger 95E vs Challenger MT755B

Verdict: Challenger 95E vs Challenger MT755B

The Challenger 95E and the Challenger MT755B are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger 95E leads on rated power with 306 hp against 301 hp. Challenger MT755B is the lighter machine (14,095 kg vs 16,111 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger 95E holds more fuel (1059.8 L vs 446.6 L) for longer stints between fills. Challenger MT755B is the newer design (2005 vs 1998). In short: choose the Challenger 95E for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT755B if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger 95E Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger MT755B Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
306 hp
301 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Challenger (a part of Caterpillar)Reference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference
Original price
$238,000Reference
Drive
crawlerReference
crawlerReference
Steering
hydrostatic differential steeringReference
electro-hydraulic powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
1059.8 LReference
787.3 LReference
Engine
305.7 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
244.4 kWReference
159.3 kWReference
Displacement
11.9 LReference
8.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
130 x 150 mmReference
112 x 149 mmReference
Power
305.7 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elements with aspiratorReference
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
16:1Reference
17.1:1Reference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2100Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
75.7 LReference
Max power
244.4 kWReference
159.3 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
228.1 kWReference
183.2 kWReference
Engine (gross)
224.5 kWReference
Power (gross)
224.5 kWReference
Torque
1406.2 NmReference
Torque RPM
1201Reference
Transmission
Gears
10 forward and 2 reverseReference
16 forward and 4 reverseReference
Transmission
Cat PowerShiftReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
225.2 kWReference
182.7 kWReference
PTO (tested)
254.9 kWReference
235.6 kWReference
Type
full power shiftReference
full power shiftReference
Valves
4Reference
Total flow
151.4 lpmReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
1000Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
228.4 kWReference
207.0 kWReference
Pressure
200.0 barReference
Rear valves
4 to 6Reference
Pump flow
164.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIN/IIIReference
Rear lift
7257 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
271 cmReference
243 cmReference
Weight
16111 kgReference
14095 kgReference
Operating weight
16111 kgReference
Length
591 cmReference
Height (cab)
344 cmReference
Shipping weight
14095 kgReference
Ground clearance
36 cmReference
Challenger 95E Tracks
Width
63 cmReference
337 cmReference
Test results
Fuel use
72.7 l/hourReference
54.5 l/hourReference
Max pull
15967 kgReference
13729 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
185Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery CCA
1000Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Challenger MT755B Tracks

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)