Compare/Challenger MT225 vs Challenger MT255
Search

Challenger MT225 vs Challenger MT255

Verdict: Challenger MT225 vs Challenger MT255

The Challenger MT225 and the Challenger MT255 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger MT255 leads on rated power with 28 hp against 23 hp. Challenger MT225 is the lighter machine (758 kg vs 1,019 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. In short: choose the Challenger MT255 for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT225 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger MT225 Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger MT255 Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
23 hp
28 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Distributor
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Manufacturer
IsekiReference
IsekiReference
liquid-cooledReference
liquid-cooledReference
Differential lock
mechanical rearReference
mechanical rearReference
Variants
1423
similar Massey Ferguson modelReference
1429
similar Massey Ferguson modelReference
Engine
Engine (gross)
17.4 kWReference
21.2 kWReference
Displacement
1.1 LReference
1.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
78 x 78 mmReference
86 x 84 mmReference
Power (gross)
17.4 kWReference
21.2 kWReference
Rated RPM
2800Reference
2500Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Fuel tank
22.7 LReference
Transmission
Gears
infinite forward and reverse (2-range)Reference
9 forward and 3 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
14.2 kWReference
18.0 kWReference
Type
hydrostaticReference
constant meshReference
Pressure
133.1 barReference
146.9 barReference
Pump flow
20.4 lpmReference
28.0 lpmReference
Total flow
29.9 lpmReference
37.5 lpmReference
Steering flow
9.5 lpmReference
9.5 lpmReference
Rear Type
IReference
IReference
Control
position controlReference
draft controlReference
Rear lift (at ends)
548 kgReference
899 kgReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
314 kgReference
600 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
liveReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540 (1.375)Reference
Mid PTO
independentReference
optionalReference
Mid PTO Type
2000Reference
2000Reference
Clutch
dry discReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
151 cmReference
163 cmReference
Weight
758 kgReference
1019 kgReference
Front tire
5.00-12Reference
6-14Reference
Rear tire
9.5-16Reference
12.4-16Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 5.00-12. Rear: 9.5-16Reference
Front: 6-14. Rear: 12.4-16Reference
Lawn/turf front
23x10.50-12Reference
24x8.50-12Reference
Lawn/turf rear
315/75D-15Reference
315/80D-16Reference
Industrial front
23x8.50-12Reference
25x8.50-14Reference
Industrial rear
12-16.5Reference
12.5/80-18Reference
Length
267 cmReference
295 cmReference
Width
104 cmReference
129 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
191 cmReference
201 cmReference
Front tread
92 cmReference
106 cmReference
Rear tread
88 cmReference
94 to 94 cmReference
Challenger MT225 attachments
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Attachment overview
60" Mower deck
Cutting width
152 cmReference
Challenger MT255 attachments

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)