Compare/Challenger MT255 vs Challenger MT275
Search

Challenger MT255 vs Challenger MT275

Verdict: Challenger MT255 vs Challenger MT275

The Challenger MT255 and the Challenger MT275 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger MT275 leads on rated power with 40 hp against 28 hp. Challenger MT255 is the lighter machine (1,019 kg vs 1,409 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. In short: choose the Challenger MT275 for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT255 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger MT255 Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger MT275 Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
28 hp
40 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Distributor
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Manufacturer
IsekiReference
IsekiReference
liquid-cooledReference
liquid-cooledReference
Differential lock
mechanical rearReference
mechanical rearReference
Variants
1429
similar Massey Ferguson modelReference
Engine
Fuel tank
22.7 LReference
Engine (gross)
21.2 kWReference
29.9 kWReference
Displacement
1.5 LReference
1.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
86 x 84 mmReference
87 x 84 mmReference
Power (gross)
21.2 kWReference
29.9 kWReference
Rated RPM
2500Reference
2600Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Transmission
Gears
9 forward and 3 reverseReference
8 forward and reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
18.0 kWReference
24.2 kWReference
Type
constant meshReference
mechanical shuttleReference
Pressure
146.9 barReference
146.9 barReference
Pump flow
28.0 lpmReference
29.1 lpmReference
Total flow
37.5 lpmReference
46.2 lpmReference
Steering flow
9.5 lpmReference
17.0 lpmReference
Rear Type
IReference
IReference
Control
draft controlReference
draft controlReference
Rear lift (at ends)
899 kgReference
1249 kgReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
600 kgReference
952 kgReference
Rear PTO
liveReference
independentReference
Clutch
dry discReference
dry discReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540 (1.375)Reference
Mid PTO
optionalReference
independentReference
Mid PTO Type
2000Reference
2000Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
163 cmReference
173 cmReference
Weight
1019 kgReference
1409 kgReference
Front tire
6-14Reference
8-16Reference
Rear tire
12.4-16Reference
13.6-24Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 6-14. Rear: 12.4-16Reference
Front: 8-16. Rear: 13.6-24Reference
Lawn/turf front
24x8.50-12Reference
305R343Reference
Lawn/turf rear
315/80D-16Reference
610R470Reference
Industrial front
25x8.50-14Reference
10-16.5Reference
Industrial rear
12.5/80-18Reference
14.9-24Reference
Length
295 cmReference
300 cmReference
Width
129 cmReference
153 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
201 cmReference
236 cmReference
Front tread
106 cmReference
111 cmReference
Rear tread
94 to 94 cmReference
114 to 144 cmReference
Height (Folded ROPS)
179 cmReference
Challenger MT255 attachments
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Attachment overview
Challenger MT275 attachments
72" Mower deck
Cutting width
182 cmReference
Challenger MH20 Backhoe
Backhoe type
Challenger MH20 BackhoeReference
Transport height
184 cmReference
Bucket width
93 cmReference
2-Foot flat digging depth
243 cmReference
Reach from pivot
284 cmReference
Bucket Rotation
165°Reference
Swing Arc
180°Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)