Compare/Challenger MT325B vs Challenger MT445
Search

Challenger MT325B vs Challenger MT445

Verdict: Challenger MT325B vs Challenger MT445

The Challenger MT325B and the Challenger MT445 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger MT445 leads on rated power with 70 hp against 68 hp. Challenger MT325B is the lighter machine (5,291 kg vs 6,211 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger MT445 holds more fuel (110.1 L vs 109.8 L) for longer stints between fills. Challenger MT325B is the newer design (2006 vs 2002). In short: choose the Challenger MT445 for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT325B if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger MT325B Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger MT445 Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
68 hp
70 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Distributor
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Manufacturer
AgritaliaReference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Four gears in three ranges with power shuttle. Push-button clutch allows gear shifting without the use of the foot clutch.Reference
Gear 2L used for pull test.Reference
Differential lock
electro-hydraulicReference
Variants
3625
similar Massey Ferguson modelReference
Engine
Fuel tank
109.8 LReference
Engine (gross)
50.7 kWReference
Displacement
3.3 LReference
4.2 LReference
Bore/Stroke
108 x 120 mmReference
103 x 127 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IIReference
Power (gross)
50.7 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Compression
18.5:1Reference
17.3:1Reference
Rated RPM
2150Reference
2200Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
10.5 LReference
ROPS Fuel tank
110.1 LReference
Cab Fuel tank
189.2 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
44.9 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Pre-heating
thermostartReference
Power at rated engine speed
52.0 kWReference
Max power
44.9 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and reverseReference
12 forward and reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
41.0 kWReference
48.5 kWReference
Type
power shuttleReference
mechanical shuttleReference
Pressure
190.0 barReference
210.0 barReference
Rear valves
2 or 3Reference
Mid valves
2Reference
Pump flow
59.8 lpmReference
Total flow
84.8 lpmReference
94.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
IIReference
Control
position and draft controlReference
electronic draft controlReference
Rear lift (at ends)
2494 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulicReference
wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/540EReference
540/1000Reference
PTO (tested)
52.0 kWReference
Valves
2 to 4Reference
SCV flow
37.9 lpmReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2812 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
50.7 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
210 cmReference
236 cmReference
Weight
5291 to 7716 poundsReference
6211 to 8170 poundsReference
Length
375 cmReference
414 cmReference
Width
193 cmReference
195 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
266 cmReference
261 cmReference
Height (cab)
260 cmReference
254 cmReference
Front tire
12.4R24Reference
Rear tire
13.6R38Reference
Ag front
12.4R24Reference
Ag rear
13.6R38Reference
Height (Folded ROPS)
198 cmReference
2WD ROPS
2817 kgReference
4WD ROPS
2969 kgReference
2WD Cab
3455 kgReference
4WD Cab
3705 kgReference
Challenger MT325B attachments
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
80Reference
Battery CCA
675Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Attachment overview
Test results
Fuel use
15.1 l/hourReference
Max pull
3161 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)