Compare/Challenger MT325B vs Challenger MT455
Search

Challenger MT325B vs Challenger MT455

Verdict: Challenger MT325B vs Challenger MT455

The Challenger MT325B and the Challenger MT455 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger MT455 leads on rated power with 75 hp against 68 hp. Challenger MT325B is the lighter machine (5,291 kg vs 6,211 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger MT455 holds more fuel (110.1 L vs 109.8 L) for longer stints between fills. Challenger MT325B is the newer design (2006 vs 2002). In short: choose the Challenger MT455 for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT325B if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger MT325B Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger MT455 Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
68 hp
75 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Distributor
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Manufacturer
AgritaliaReference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Four gears in three ranges with power shuttle. Push-button clutch allows gear shifting without the use of the foot clutch.Reference
Gear 1L used for pull test.Reference
Differential lock
electro-hydraulicReference
Variants
3625
similar Massey Ferguson modelReference
Engine
Fuel tank
109.8 LReference
Engine (gross)
50.7 kWReference
Displacement
3.3 LReference
4.0 LReference
Bore/Stroke
108 x 120 mmReference
100 x 127 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IIReference
Power (gross)
50.7 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Compression
18.5:1Reference
17.3:1Reference
Rated RPM
2150Reference
2200Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
10.5 LReference
ROPS Fuel tank
110.1 LReference
Cab Fuel tank
189.2 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
47.1 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Pre-heating
thermostartReference
Max power
47.1 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
56.1 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and reverseReference
12 forward and reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
41.0 kWReference
55.9 kWReference
Type
power shuttleReference
mechanical shuttleReference
Pressure
190.0 barReference
210.0 barReference
Rear valves
2 or 3Reference
Mid valves
2Reference
Pump flow
59.8 lpmReference
Total flow
84.8 lpmReference
94.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
IIReference
Control
position and draft controlReference
electronic draft controlReference
Rear lift (at ends)
2494 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulicReference
wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/540EReference
540/1000Reference
PTO (tested)
58.1 kWReference
Valves
2 to 4Reference
SCV flow
37.9 lpmReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2812 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
57.8 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
210 cmReference
236 cmReference
Weight
5291 to 7716 poundsReference
6211 to 8287 poundsReference
Length
375 cmReference
414 cmReference
Width
193 cmReference
205 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
266 cmReference
264 cmReference
Height (cab)
260 cmReference
256 cmReference
Front tire
14.9R34Reference
Rear tire
18.4R34Reference
Ag front
14.9R34Reference
Ag rear
18.4R34Reference
Height (Folded ROPS)
200 cmReference
2WD ROPS
2817 kgReference
4WD ROPS
2969 kgReference
2WD Cab
3508 kgReference
4WD Cab
3758 kgReference
Challenger MT325B attachments
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
80Reference
Battery CCA
675Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Attachment overview
Test results
Fuel use
19.7 l/hourReference
Max pull
4059 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)