Compare/Challenger MT475B vs Challenger MT545

Challenger MT475B vs Challenger MT545

Verdict: Challenger MT475B vs Challenger MT545

The Challenger MT475B and the Challenger MT545 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger MT545 leads on rated power with 121 hp against 120 hp. Challenger MT545 is the lighter machine (10,082 kg vs 11,195 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger MT545 holds more fuel (224.8 L vs 143.8 L) for longer stints between fills. Challenger MT475B is the newer design (2008 vs 2002). In short: choose the Challenger MT545 for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT475B if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Challenger

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Challenger

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

120 hp

121 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference

Four power shift gears in four ranges.Reference

Four synchronized gears (1-4) in two synchronized ranges (low/high) with a four-speed (A-D) power shift on the left-hand power shuttle lever.Reference

Original price

$73,066 (2009 4WD )Reference

—

Final drives

inboard planetaryReference

—

Differential lock

electro-hydraulicReference

—

Trailer brakes

hydraulicReference

—

Variants

5465

similar Massey Ferguson modelReference

—

6290

—

similar Massey Ferguson modelReference

Engine

Fuel tank

208.2 LReference

—

Engine (gross)

89.5 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

63.6 kWReference

84.7 kWReference

Displacement

6.6 LReference

6.0 LReference

Bore/Stroke

105 x 127 mmReference

100 x 127 mmReference

Emissions

Tier IIIReference

—

Power (gross)

89.5 kWReference

—

Fuel system

electronic high pressure common railReference

—

Air cleaner

dryReference

dual paper elementsReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Max power

63.6 kWReference

84.7 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

77.7 kWReference

89.9 kWReference

Fuel Type

dieselReference

—

No of Cylinders

6 cylinderReference

—

Rated engine speed

2,200 RPMReference

—

Emissions compliance

Tier IIIReference

—

Bore and stroke

4.134x5.00 inchesReference

—

Cooling system

liquid-cooledReference

—

Cab Fuel tank

—

224.8 LReference

ROPS Fuel tank

—

160.1 LReference

Compression

—

16.0:1Reference

Transmission

AutoPower IVReference

Gears

16 forward and reverseReference

32 forward and reverseReference

Clutch

wet discReference

hydraulic wet discReference

Transmission Type

PowershiftReference

—

forward and reverse options

AutoPower IV 16F and 16RReference

—

Wheel Drive

4WDReference

—

Rear Axle Drive Type

inboard planetaryReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

74.6 kWReference

89.5 kWReference

PTO (tested)

92.7 kWReference

89.9 kWReference

Type

four speed power shiftReference

partial power shiftReference

Valves

2 to 4Reference

SCV flow

56.8 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIReference

Control

lower-link draft sensingReference

—

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

4168 kgReference

4082 kgReference

Front Hitch

optionalReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000Reference

Front PTO

independentReference

—

Front PTO Type

1000 (1.375)Reference

—

Power at rated PTO speed

91.1 kWReference

94.1 kWReference

Pressure

—

200.0 barReference

Total flow

—

106.0 lpmReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

281 cmReference

275 cmReference

Weight

11195 to 11905 poundsReference

10082 to 11437 poundsReference

Front tire

10.00-16Reference

11.00-16Reference

2WD Rear tire

460/85R34Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 460/85R34Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 340/85R28. Rear: 420/85R38Reference

—

2WD Optional tires (ag)

Front: 11.00-16. Rear: 460/85R38Reference

—

4WD Optional tires (ag)

Front: 440/65R28. Rear: 540/65R38Reference

—

Length

481 cmReference

454 cmReference

Width

201 cmReference

223 cmReference

Height (cab)

279 cmReference

276 cmReference

2WD Weight

5078 kgReference

—

4WD Weight

5400 kgReference

—

Front tread

145 to 216 cmReference

—

Rear tire

—

208R38Reference

Ag front

—

16.9R28 (4WD)Reference

Ag rear

—

208R38Reference

2WD ROPS Shipping

—

4573 kgReference

4WD ROPS Shipping

—

5118 kgReference

2WD Cab Shipping

—

4823 kgReference

4WD Cab Shipping

—

5187 kgReference

Challenger MT475B attachments

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

120Reference

—

Battery CCA

775Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

—

Total cold cranking amps

775 CCAReference

—

Attachment overview

Test results

Fuel use

25.4 l/hourReference

29.1 l/hourReference

Max pull

5400 kgReference

4955 kgReference

General

Make & Model

Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference

—

Country of manufacturer

FranceReference

—

Capacities

Capacity

402.8 ciReference

—

Hydraulics

Capacity Valves

24 ValvesReference

—

Hydraulics Type

open center | closed centerReference

—

Remote Valves

2 to 4 ValvesReference

—

Rear Hitch category (SAE designation)

Category IIReference

—

Rear Hitch Sensing Type

lower-link draft sensingReference

—

PTO

PTO Power

100 hpReference

—

Rear PTO Power

AvailableReference

—

Rear PTO RPM

1,000 RPMReference

—

Front PTO Power

AvailableReference

—

Steering & brakes

Brakes

hydraulic wet discReference

—

Steering type

powerReference

—

Dimensions & weight

Height Over Cab

279.9 cmReference

—

Overall Length

481.8 cmReference

—

Overall Width

201.4 cmReference

—

Overall weight

5,400 kgReference

—

Wheels & tyres

Rear Wheel Type

460/85R34 (2WD)Reference

—

Front Wheel Type

10.00-16Reference

—

Front Wheel tread range

145.5 cmReference

—

Operator station

Cab Availability

AvailableReference

—

Seat Suspension

TrueReference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.