Compare/Challenger MT755B vs Challenger MT765

Challenger MT755B vs Challenger MT765

Verdict: Challenger MT755B vs Challenger MT765

The Challenger MT755B and the Challenger MT765 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger MT765 leads on rated power with 306 hp against 301 hp. Challenger MT765 is the lighter machine (13,390 kg vs 14,095 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger MT755B is the newer design (2005 vs 2002). In short: choose the Challenger MT765 for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT755B if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Challenger

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Challenger

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

301 hp

306 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference

Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference

Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference

Drive

crawlerReference

Steering

electro-hydraulic powerReference

electro-hydraulicReference

Engine

Fuel tank

787.3 LReference

Engine (gross)

224.5 kWReference

228.2 kWReference

Drawbar (tested)

159.3 kWReference

192.8 kWReference

Displacement

8.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

112 x 149 mmReference

Power (gross)

224.5 kWReference

228.2 kWReference

Air cleaner

dual paper elementsReference

Compression

17.1:1Reference

16.0:1Reference

Rated RPM

2100Reference

Torque

1406.2 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1201Reference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Max power

159.3 kWReference

192.8 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

183.2 kWReference

193.4 kWReference

Drawbar (claimed)

—

182.7 kWReference

Transmission

Cat PowerShiftReference

CaterpillarReference

Gears

16 forward and 4 reverseReference

30 forward and 8 reverseReference

Clutch

hydraulic wet discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

182.7 kWReference

190.2 kWReference

PTO (tested)

235.6 kWReference

222.8 kWReference

Type

full power shiftReference

creeperReference

Pressure

200.0 barReference

Rear valves

4 to 6Reference

—

Pump flow

164.6 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIIN/IIIReference

IIIReference

Rear lift

7257 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

1000 (1.75)Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

207.0 kWReference

211.0 kWReference

Valves

—

4 to 6Reference

Total flow

—

164.6 lpmReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

243 cmReference

Weight

14095 kgReference

13390 kgReference

Length

591 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

344 cmReference

—

Shipping weight

14095 kgReference

—

Ground clearance

36 cmReference

—

Bar rear axle

—

4064 mmReference

Gauge

—

304 to 406 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

185Reference

160Reference

Batteries

2Reference

—

Battery CCA

1000Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Challenger MT755B Tracks

Width

337 cmReference

—

Test results

Fuel use

54.5 l/hourReference

67.8 l/hourReference

Max pull

13729 kgReference

15668 kgReference

MT765 Serial Numbers

2002

—

AMS20000Reference

2003

—

AMS30000Reference

2004

—

AMS40000Reference

Location:

—

On main tractor frame, front left side.Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.