Compare/Challenger MT851 vs Challenger MT865
Search

Challenger MT851 vs Challenger MT865

Verdict: Challenger MT851 vs Challenger MT865

The Challenger MT851 and the Challenger MT865 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Challenger MT851 leads on rated power with 504 hp against 500 hp. Challenger MT865 is the lighter machine (18,597 kg vs 19,051 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Challenger MT851 is the newer design (2021 vs 2002). In short: choose the Challenger MT851 for outright pulling power, or the Challenger MT865 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Challenger MT851 Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Challenger MT865 Tractor
Challenger
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
504 hp
500 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
Challenger (a part of AGCO)Reference
liquid-cooled inlineReference
Gear 3 used for pull test.Reference
Drive
crawlerReference
crawlerReference
Variants
1151 Vario MT
similar Fendt modelReference
Engine
Fuel tank
1324.8 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
135.1 LReference
Engine (gross)
376.0 kWReference
372.9 kWReference
Displacement
15.3 LReference
15.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
138 x 170 mmReference
140 x 171 mmReference
Rated Power (gross)
376.0 kWReference
Rated RPM
1730Reference
2100Reference
Torque
2500.5 NmReference
Torque RPM
1450Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
24Reference
12Reference
Oil change
500 hReference
Drawbar (tested)
282.4 kWReference
Emissions
Tier 2Reference
Power (gross)
372.9 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
15.5:1Reference
Max power
282.4 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
331.2 kWReference
Transmission
Transmission
Accu-VTReference
CaterpillarReference
Gears
infinite forward and reverseReference
16 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
hydraulic wet discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Type
continuously-variable transmissionReference
full power shiftReference
Pressure
200.0 barReference
200.0 barReference
Rear valves
4 to 8Reference
4 to 6Reference
Pump flow
439.8 lpmReference
223.3 lpmReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000/1000EReference
1000 (1.75)Reference
PTO (claimed)
310.2 kWReference
PTO (tested)
390.4 kWReference
Hydraulic system
264.9 LReference
Capacity
264.9 LReference
SCV flow
113.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
IVNReference
Rear lift
8845 kgReference
Power at rated PTO speed
366.1 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
299 cmReference
299 cmReference
Weight
19051 kgReference
18597 kgReference
Length
675 cmReference
675 cmReference
Width
294 cmReference
360 cmReference
Height
375 cmReference
Max weight
26762 kgReference
Ground clearance
35 cmReference
47 cmReference
Gauge
223 to 325 cmReference
228 to 325 cmReference
Height (cab)
350 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
352 cmReference
Shipping
18597 kgReference
Ballasted
22680 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
325Reference
160Reference
Batteries
3Reference
4Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Capacities
Fuel
1249.0 LReference
Max capacity
27216 kgReference
MT865 Serial Numbers
2002
BDS20000Reference
2003
BDS30000Reference
2004
BDS40000Reference
Location:
Serial number plate on the left side of the tractor frame.Reference
Challenger MT865 Tracks
Test results
Fuel use
101.4 l/hourReference
Max pull
19601 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)