Compare/Cockshutt 1600 vs Cockshutt 570
Search

Cockshutt 1600 vs Cockshutt 570

Verdict: Cockshutt 1600 vs Cockshutt 570

The Cockshutt 1600 and the Cockshutt 570 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 1600 leads on rated power with 58 hp against 52 hp. Cockshutt 570 is the lighter machine (3,175 kg vs 3,356 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 1600 is the newer design (1963 vs 1958). In short: choose the Cockshutt 1600 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 570 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt 1600 Tractor
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt 570 Tractor
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
58 hp
52 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CockshuttReference
CockshuttReference
Six speeds forward and two reverse. A control knob enables a power shift between direct drive and the Hydra-Power range.Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Steering
power-assist optionalReference
power assistReference
Engine
Gas Drawbar (claimed)
38.4 kWReference
LP-gas Drawbar (claimed)
35.4 kWReference
Plows
4-5Reference
5Reference
Drawbar (tested)
35.1 kWReference
39.0 kWReference
Displacement
3.8 LReference
4.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
89 x 102 mmReference
95 x 114 mmReference
Compression
9:1Reference
17.8:1Reference
Rated RPM
1900Reference
1650Reference
Firing order
1-5-3-6-2-4Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
oil bathReference
Power at rated engine speed
42.1 kWReference
Max power
35.1 kWReference
39.0 kWReference
Fuel tank
113.6 LReference
Belt (tested)
45.4 kWReference
Belt power (max)
45.4 kWReference
Transmission
Type
partial power shiftReference
unsynchronized gearReference
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
6 forward and 2 reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
dry discReference
Transmission
Hydra-PowerReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Gas PTO (claimed)
44.7 kWReference
LP-gas PTO (claimed)
41.8 kWReference
PTO (tested)
43.2 kWReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
38.2 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
268 cmReference
Weight
3356 kgReference
3175 kgReference
Front tire
6.50-16Reference
7.50x16Reference
Rear tire
16.9-34Reference
13.6/12x38Reference
Ag front
6.50-16Reference
6.00x16Reference
Ag rear
16.9-34Reference
18x26Reference
Operating weight
3356 kgReference
3175 kgReference
Ballasted weight
4998 kgReference
5241 kgReference
Tricycle Wheelbase
230 cmReference
Row-crop Wheelbase
230 cmReference
Standard Wheelbase
222 cmReference
Tricycle Length
360 cmReference
Row-crop Length
373 cmReference
Standard Length
350 cmReference
Height (hood)
177 cmReference
Row-crop Front tread
135 to 144 cmReference
Standard Front tread
135 to 144 cmReference
Row-crop Rear tread
147 to 223 cmReference
1600 Serial Numbers
1962
124-420 (A)Reference
1963
137-613 (B)Reference
1964
140-723 (B)Reference
Location:
Serial number plate on the instrument panel.Reference
Final
147-568 (B)Reference
Test results
Fuel use
19.7 l/hourReference
Max pull
3851 kgReference
4110 kgReference
Belt fuel use (max)
15.1 l/hourReference
570 Serial Numbers
1958
DM1001Reference
1959
DN5001Reference
1960
DO7001Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)