Compare/Cockshutt 1650 vs Cockshutt 1800
Search

Cockshutt 1650 vs Cockshutt 1800

Verdict: Cockshutt 1650 vs Cockshutt 1800

The Cockshutt 1650 and the Cockshutt 1800 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 1800 leads on rated power with 77 hp against 66 hp. Cockshutt 1650 is the lighter machine (3,544 kg vs 9,205 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 1800 holds more fuel (138.2 L vs 87.1 L) for longer stints between fills. Cockshutt 1650 is the newer design (1964 vs 1963). In short: choose the Cockshutt 1800 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 1650 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt 1650 Tractor
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt 1800 Tractor
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
66 hp
77 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
CockshuttReference
Introduced in late 1967, the Hydraul-Shift transmission provided an on-the-move shift to underdrive and overdrive.Reference
Hydra-Power Drive adds a power shift between direct engine drive and a lower gear.Reference
Original price
$7,100 (1969)Reference
Steering
power assistReference
hydrostatic power (Series C)Reference
Engine
Fuel tank
106.0 LReference
119.2 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
43.8 kWReference
51.0 kWReference
Displacement
4.3 LReference
4.6 LReference
Bore/Stroke
95 x 102 mmReference
98 x 102 mmReference
Compression
8.5:1Reference
8.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
6.3 LReference
Coolant capacity
18.9 LReference
Air cleaner
dryReference
oil bathReference
Firing order
1-5-3-6-2-4Reference
Max power
43.8 kWReference
51.0 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
49.8 kWReference
60.2 kWReference
Transmission
Transmission
Hydraul-ShiftReference
Hydra-PowerReference
Type
partial power shiftReference
partial power shiftReference
Gears
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
dry discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
49.2 kWReference
PTO (tested)
49.8 kWReference
60.2 kWReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540/1000Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
209 cmReference
277 cmReference
Weight
3544 kgReference
9205 to 10675 poundsReference
Front tire
6.50-16Reference
7.50-15Reference
Rear tire
15.5-38Reference
18.4-34Reference
Ag front
13.6/12-24 (4WD)Reference
7.50-15Reference
Ag rear
9.5/9-42Reference
18.4-34Reference
Length
369 cmReference
405 cmReference
Width
207 cmReference
219 cmReference
Height (steering wheel)
203 cmReference
202 cmReference
Operating weight
3544 kgReference
Ballasted weight
5005 kgReference
Front tread
167/178 cmReference
167/179 cmReference
Rear tread
143 to 227 cmReference
172 to 227 cmReference
Operating
4842 kgReference
Ballasted
6506 kgReference
Cockshutt 1650 attachments
1650 Serial Numbers
1964
149836Reference
140 893 (Series C)Reference
1965
153885Reference
1966
167668Reference
1967
183928Reference
1968
201091Reference
1969
212733Reference
Location:
Instrument panel supportReference
Serial plate on instrument panel.Reference
Final
218193Reference
149 818 (Series C)Reference
Test results
Fuel use
22.0 l/hourReference
24.6 l/hourReference
Max pull
3681 kgReference
6420 kgReference
1800 Serial Numbers
1962
124 397 (Series B)Reference
1963
129 286 (Series C)Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)