Compare/Cockshutt 1755 vs Cockshutt 1800
Search

Cockshutt 1755 vs Cockshutt 1800

Verdict: Cockshutt 1755 vs Cockshutt 1800

The Cockshutt 1755 and the Cockshutt 1800 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 1755 leads on rated power with 87 hp against 77 hp. Cockshutt 1755 is the lighter machine (4,354 kg vs 9,205 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 1755 is the newer design (1970 vs 1963). In short: choose the Cockshutt 1755 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 1800 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt 1755 Tractor
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt 1800 Tractor
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
87 hp
77 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
CockshuttReference
The Hydraul-Shift overs a power shift between over-, under-, and direct-drive for each gear.Reference
Hydra-Power Drive adds a power shift between direct engine drive and a lower gear.Reference
Steering
hydrostatic power (Series C)Reference
Engine
Drawbar (tested)
55.1 kWReference
51.0 kWReference
Displacement
4.6 LReference
4.6 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 102 mmReference
98 x 102 mmReference
Air cleaner
dryReference
oil bathReference
Compression
8.5:1Reference
8.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
2400Reference
2200Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
7.6 LReference
Coolant capacity
18.9 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
64.8 kWReference
60.2 kWReference
Max power
55.1 kWReference
51.0 kWReference
Fuel tank
119.2 LReference
Transmission
Gears
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
305mm cerametallic discReference
dry discReference
Transmission
Hydraul-ShiftReference
Hydra-PowerReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
64.1 kWReference
PTO (tested)
64.8 kWReference
60.2 kWReference
Hydraulic system
25.5 LReference
Type
partial power shiftReference
partial power shiftReference
Capacity
25.5 LReference
Pump flow
75.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IIIReference
Rear lift
2721 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
540/1000Reference
Capacities
Fuel
132.5 LReference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
261 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
219 cmReference
Weight
4354 kgReference
9205 to 10675 poundsReference
Front tire
7.50-15Reference
7.50-15Reference
Rear tire
18.4-34Reference
18.4-34Reference
2WD Ag front
11.00L-15Reference
4WD Ag front
14.9-26Reference
Ag rear
12.4-42Reference
18.4-34Reference
2WD Length
405 cmReference
4WD Length
387 cmReference
Width
204 cmReference
219 cmReference
Height (steering wheel)
217 cmReference
202 cmReference
Operating weight
4354 kgReference
Ballasted weight
6010 kgReference
2WD Ground clearance
64 cmReference
4WD Ground clearance
34 cmReference
2WD Front tread
156 to 222 cmReference
4WD Front tread
152/179/203 cmReference
Rear tread
144 to 303 cmReference
172 to 227 cmReference
Wheelbase
277 cmReference
Ag front
7.50-15Reference
Length
405 cmReference
Front tread
167/179 cmReference
Operating
4842 kgReference
Ballasted
6506 kgReference
1755 Serial Numbers
1970
221-603Reference
1971
226-445Reference
1972
231-415Reference
1973
238-136Reference
1974
245-667Reference
1975
257-515Reference
Final
260-346Reference
149 818 (Series C)Reference
Test results
Fuel use
25.0 l/hourReference
24.6 l/hourReference
Max pull
4785 kgReference
6420 kgReference
Speeds
1800 Serial Numbers
1962
124 397 (Series B)Reference
1963
129 286 (Series C)Reference
1964
140 893 (Series C)Reference
Location:
Serial plate on instrument panel.Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)