Search
Cockshutt 1755 vs Cockshutt 1855
Verdict: Cockshutt 1755 vs Cockshutt 1855
The Cockshutt 1755 and the Cockshutt 1855 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 1855 leads on rated power with 99 hp against 87 hp. Cockshutt 1755 is the lighter machine (4,354 kg vs 5,057 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. In short: choose the Cockshutt 1855 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 1755 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Clear
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
87 hp
99 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
The Hydraul-Shift overs a power shift between over-, under-, and direct-drive for each gear.Reference
The Hydraul-Shift overs a power shift between over-, under-, and direct-drive for each gear.Reference
Engine
Drawbar (tested)
55.1 kWReference
61.6 kWReference
Displacement
4.6 LReference
5.1 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 102 mmReference
98 x 111 mmReference
Air cleaner
dryReference
dryReference
Compression
8.5:1Reference
8.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
2400Reference
2400Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
7.6 LReference
—
Coolant capacity
18.9 LReference
18.9 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
64.8 kWReference
73.5 kWReference
Max power
55.1 kWReference
61.6 kWReference
Fuel tank
—
132.5 LReference
Transmission
Gears
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
Clutch
305mm cerametallic discReference
330mm cerametallic discReference
Transmission
Hydraul-ShiftReference
Hydraul-ShiftReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
64.1 kWReference
73.1 kWReference
PTO (tested)
64.8 kWReference
73.5 kWReference
Hydraulic system
25.5 LReference
—
Type
partial power shiftReference
partial power shiftReference
Capacity
25.5 LReference
—
Pump flow
75.7 lpmReference
75.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IIIReference
II/III (optional)Reference
Rear lift
2721 kgReference
2721 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
1000Reference
Engine RPM
—
984@2400Reference
Capacities
Fuel
132.5 LReference
—
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
261 cmReference
261 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
219 cmReference
219 cmReference
Weight
4354 kgReference
5057 kgReference
Front tire
7.50-15Reference
11L-15Reference
Rear tire
18.4-34Reference
23.1-34Reference
2WD Ag front
11.00L-15Reference
—
4WD Ag front
14.9-26Reference
—
Ag rear
12.4-42Reference
23.1-34Reference
2WD Length
405 cmReference
405 cmReference
4WD Length
387 cmReference
387 cmReference
Width
204 cmReference
204 cmReference
Height (steering wheel)
217 cmReference
217 cmReference
Operating weight
4354 kgReference
—
Ballasted weight
6010 kgReference
—
2WD Ground clearance
64 cmReference
64 cmReference
4WD Ground clearance
34 cmReference
34 cmReference
2WD Front tread
156 to 222 cmReference
156 to 222 cmReference
4WD Front tread
152/179/203 cmReference
152/179/203 cmReference
Rear tread
144 to 303 cmReference
144 to 303 cmReference
Ag front
—
11L-15Reference
1755 Serial Numbers
1970
221-603Reference
221-099Reference
1971
226-445Reference
225-508Reference
1972
231-415Reference
231-366Reference
1973
238-136Reference
236-585Reference
1974
245-667Reference
247-436Reference
1975
257-515Reference
255-727Reference
Final
260-346Reference
255-785Reference
Test results
Fuel use
25.0 l/hourReference
22.7 l/hourReference
Max pull
4785 kgReference
5210 kgReference
Speeds
1855 Serial Numbers
1969
—
220-640Reference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.