Compare/Cockshutt 1855 vs Cockshutt 1900

Cockshutt 1855 vs Cockshutt 1900

Verdict: Cockshutt 1855 vs Cockshutt 1900

The Cockshutt 1855 and the Cockshutt 1900 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 99 hp. Cockshutt 1855 is the lighter machine (5,057 kg vs 5,443 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 1855 is the newer design (1970 vs 1963). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Cockshutt

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Cockshutt

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

99 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference

CockshuttReference

The Hydraul-Shift overs a power shift between over-, under-, and direct-drive for each gear.Reference

Gear 1-Direct used for pull test.Reference

Steering

—

power (late)Reference

Engine

Fuel tank

132.5 LReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

61.6 kWReference

65.8 kWReference

Displacement

5.1 LReference

3.5 LReference

Bore/Stroke

98 x 111 mmReference

98 x 114 mmReference

Air cleaner

dryReference

oil bathReference

Compression

8.5:1Reference

21:1Reference

Rated RPM

2400Reference

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Coolant capacity

18.9 LReference

19.9 LReference

Power at rated engine speed

73.5 kWReference

75.0 kWReference

Max power

61.6 kWReference

65.8 kWReference

Oil capacity

—

13.7 LReference

Transmission

Gears

18 forward and 6 reverseReference

12 forward and 4 reverseReference

Clutch

330mm cerametallic discReference

dry discReference

Transmission

Hydraul-ShiftReference

Hydra-PowerReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

73.1 kWReference

—

PTO (tested)

73.5 kWReference

75.0 kWReference

Type

partial power shiftReference

Pump flow

75.7 lpmReference

49.2 lpmReference

Rear Type

II/III (optional)Reference

II/IReference

Rear lift

2721 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

1000Reference

Engine RPM

984@2400Reference

1000@2000Reference

Hydraulic system

—

18.9 LReference

Capacity

—

18.9 LReference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

261 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

219 cmReference

—

Weight

5057 kgReference

5443 kgReference

Front tire

11L-15Reference

7.50-18Reference

Rear tire

23.1-34Reference

18-26Reference

Ag front

11L-15Reference

7.50-18Reference

Ag rear

23.1-34Reference

15-34Reference

2WD Length

405 cmReference

—

4WD Length

387 cmReference

—

Width

204 cmReference

246 cmReference

Height (steering wheel)

217 cmReference

193 cmReference

2WD Ground clearance

64 cmReference

—

4WD Ground clearance

34 cmReference

—

2WD Front tread

156 to 222 cmReference

—

4WD Front tread

152/179/203 cmReference

—

Rear tread

144 to 303 cmReference

187/208 cmReference

Wheelbase

—

247 cmReference

Length

—

397 cmReference

Operating weight

—

5443 kgReference

Ballasted weight

—

8325 kgReference

Ground clearance

—

60 cmReference

Front tread

—

176 cmReference

1855 Serial Numbers

1969

220-640Reference

—

1970

221-099Reference

—

1971

225-508Reference

—

1972

231-366Reference

—

1973

236-585Reference

—

1974

247-436Reference

—

1975

255-727Reference

—

Final

255-785Reference

148-651 (C)Reference

Test results

Fuel use

22.7 l/hourReference

27.3 l/hourReference

Max pull

5210 kgReference

7707 kgReference

Speeds

Capacities

Fuel

—

119.2 LReference

1900 Serial Numbers

1960

—

90-532 (A)Reference

1961

—

111-028 (A)Reference

1962

—

124-396 (B)Reference

1963

—

138-440 (C)Reference

1964

—

141-168 (C)Reference

Location:

—

Serial plate on instrument panel.Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.