Compare/Cockshutt 1855 vs Cockshutt 1950
Search

Cockshutt 1855 vs Cockshutt 1950

Verdict: Cockshutt 1855 vs Cockshutt 1950

The Cockshutt 1855 and the Cockshutt 1950 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 1950 leads on rated power with 106 hp against 99 hp. Cockshutt 1855 is the lighter machine (5,057 kg vs 11,955 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 1855 is the newer design (1970 vs 1964). In short: choose the Cockshutt 1950 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 1855 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt 1855 Tractor
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt 1950 Tractor
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
99 hp
106 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
The Hydraul-Shift overs a power shift between over-, under-, and direct-drive for each gear.Reference
The Oliver Hydra-Power transmission provided a power shift to a lower speed for each gear.Reference
Steering
hydraulic powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
132.5 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
61.6 kWReference
73.1 kWReference
Displacement
5.1 LReference
3.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 111 mmReference
98 x 114 mmReference
Air cleaner
dryReference
dual dry elementReference
Compression
8.5:1Reference
21:1Reference
Rated RPM
2400Reference
2400Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
18.9 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
73.5 kWReference
78.9 kWReference
Max power
61.6 kWReference
69.5 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
330mm cerametallic discReference
Transmission
Hydraul-ShiftReference
Hydra-PowerReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
73.1 kWReference
78.3 kWReference
PTO (tested)
73.5 kWReference
78.9 kWReference
Type
partial power shiftReference
partial power shiftReference
Pump flow
75.7 lpmReference
44.3 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/III (optional)Reference
II/IReference
Rear lift
2721 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
540Reference
Engine RPM
984@2400Reference
540@2400Reference
Hydraulic system
13.2 LReference
Capacity
13.2 LReference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
261 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
219 cmReference
Weight
5057 kgReference
11955 to 12975 poundsReference
Front tire
11L-15Reference
11.00-16Reference
Rear tire
23.1-34Reference
23.1-34Reference
Ag front
11L-15Reference
11.00-16Reference
Ag rear
23.1-34Reference
23.1-34Reference
2WD Length
405 cmReference
4WD Length
387 cmReference
Width
204 cmReference
Height (steering wheel)
217 cmReference
2WD Ground clearance
64 cmReference
4WD Ground clearance
34 cmReference
2WD Front tread
156 to 222 cmReference
4WD Front tread
152/179/203 cmReference
Rear tread
144 to 303 cmReference
187/208 cmReference
Wheelbase
216 cmReference
Front tread
167/179 cmReference
Operating
5422 kgReference
Ballasted
9037 kgReference
1855 Serial Numbers
1969
220-640Reference
1970
221-099Reference
1971
225-508Reference
1972
231-366Reference
1973
236-585Reference
1974
247-436Reference
1975
255-727Reference
Final
255-785Reference
199186Reference
Test results
Fuel use
22.7 l/hourReference
27.6 l/hourReference
Max pull
5210 kgReference
7972 kgReference
Speeds
Capacities
Fuel
104.1 LReference
Cockshutt 1950 attachments
1950 Serial Numbers
1964
150492Reference
1965
153016Reference
1966
168190Reference
1967
189008Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)