Search
Cockshutt 1855 vs Cockshutt 1955
Verdict: Cockshutt 1855 vs Cockshutt 1955
The Cockshutt 1855 and the Cockshutt 1955 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 1955 leads on rated power with 108 hp against 99 hp. Cockshutt 1855 is the lighter machine (5,057 kg vs 5,103 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. In short: choose the Cockshutt 1955 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 1855 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
99 hp
108 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
The Hydraul-Shift overs a power shift between over-, under-, and direct-drive for each gear.Reference
The Hydraul-Shift overs a power shift between over-, under-, and direct-drive for each gear.Reference
Engine
Fuel tank
132.5 LReference
132.5 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
61.6 kWReference
67.4 kWReference
Displacement
5.1 LReference
5.1 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 111 mmReference
98 x 111 mmReference
Air cleaner
dryReference
dryReference
Compression
8.5:1Reference
—
Rated RPM
2400Reference
2400Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
18.9 LReference
18.9 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
73.5 kWReference
80.7 kWReference
Max power
61.6 kWReference
67.4 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
Clutch
330mm cerametallic discReference
330mm cerametallic discReference
Transmission
Hydraul-ShiftReference
Hydraul-ShiftReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
73.1 kWReference
80.5 kWReference
PTO (tested)
73.5 kWReference
80.7 kWReference
Type
partial power shiftReference
partial power shiftReference
Pump flow
75.7 lpmReference
75.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/III (optional)Reference
II/IIIReference
Rear lift
2721 kgReference
2721 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
1000Reference
Engine RPM
984@2400Reference
—
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
261 cmReference
261 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
219 cmReference
219 cmReference
Weight
5057 kgReference
5103 kgReference
Front tire
11L-15Reference
11L-15Reference
Rear tire
23.1-34Reference
20.8-38Reference
Ag front
11L-15Reference
11L-15Reference
Ag rear
23.1-34Reference
20.8-38Reference
2WD Length
405 cmReference
405 cmReference
4WD Length
387 cmReference
387 cmReference
Width
204 cmReference
204 cmReference
Height (steering wheel)
217 cmReference
217 cmReference
2WD Ground clearance
64 cmReference
64 cmReference
4WD Ground clearance
34 cmReference
34 cmReference
2WD Front tread
156 to 222 cmReference
156 to 222 cmReference
4WD Front tread
152/179/203 cmReference
152/179/203 cmReference
Rear tread
144 to 303 cmReference
144 to 303 cmReference
Operating weight
—
5103 kgReference
Ballasted weight
—
7357 kgReference
1855 Serial Numbers
1969
220-640Reference
—
1970
221-099Reference
222-304Reference
1971
225-508Reference
226-858Reference
1972
231-366Reference
232-958Reference
1973
236-585Reference
239-032Reference
1974
247-436Reference
247-871Reference
1975
255-727Reference
—
Final
255-785Reference
253-050Reference
Test results
Fuel use
22.7 l/hourReference
26.5 l/hourReference
Max pull
5210 kgReference
5733 kgReference
Speeds
1955 Serial Numbers
Electrical
Ground
—
negativeReference
Battery volts
—
12Reference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.