Compare/Cockshutt 1900 vs Cockshutt 1950
Search

Cockshutt 1900 vs Cockshutt 1950

Verdict: Cockshutt 1900 vs Cockshutt 1950

The Cockshutt 1900 and the Cockshutt 1950 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 1950 leads on rated power with 106 hp against 99 hp. Cockshutt 1900 is the lighter machine (5,443 kg vs 11,955 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 1950 is the newer design (1964 vs 1963). In short: choose the Cockshutt 1950 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 1900 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt 1900 Tractor
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt 1950 Tractor
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
99 hp
106 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CockshuttReference
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
Gear 1-Direct used for pull test.Reference
The Oliver Hydra-Power transmission provided a power shift to a lower speed for each gear.Reference
Steering
power (late)Reference
hydraulic powerReference
Engine
Drawbar (tested)
65.8 kWReference
73.1 kWReference
Displacement
3.5 LReference
3.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 114 mmReference
98 x 114 mmReference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
dual dry elementReference
Compression
21:1Reference
21:1Reference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2400Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
13.7 LReference
Coolant capacity
19.9 LReference
Max power
65.8 kWReference
69.5 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
75.0 kWReference
78.9 kWReference
Transmission
Type
partial power shiftReference
partial power shiftReference
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
Transmission
Hydra-PowerReference
Hydra-PowerReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (tested)
75.0 kWReference
78.9 kWReference
Hydraulic system
18.9 LReference
13.2 LReference
Capacity
18.9 LReference
13.2 LReference
Pump flow
49.2 lpmReference
44.3 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
II/IReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
540Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2000Reference
540@2400Reference
PTO (claimed)
78.3 kWReference
Capacities
Fuel
119.2 LReference
104.1 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
247 cmReference
216 cmReference
Weight
5443 kgReference
11955 to 12975 poundsReference
Front tire
7.50-18Reference
11.00-16Reference
Rear tire
18-26Reference
23.1-34Reference
Ag front
7.50-18Reference
11.00-16Reference
Ag rear
15-34Reference
23.1-34Reference
Length
397 cmReference
Width
246 cmReference
Height (steering wheel)
193 cmReference
Operating weight
5443 kgReference
Ballasted weight
8325 kgReference
Ground clearance
60 cmReference
Front tread
176 cmReference
167/179 cmReference
Rear tread
187/208 cmReference
187/208 cmReference
Operating
5422 kgReference
Ballasted
9037 kgReference
1900 Serial Numbers
1960
90-532 (A)Reference
1961
111-028 (A)Reference
1962
124-396 (B)Reference
1963
138-440 (C)Reference
1964
141-168 (C)Reference
150492Reference
Location:
Serial plate on instrument panel.Reference
Final
148-651 (C)Reference
199186Reference
Test results
Fuel use
27.3 l/hourReference
27.6 l/hourReference
Max pull
7707 kgReference
7972 kgReference
Cockshutt 1950 attachments
1950 Serial Numbers
1965
153016Reference
1966
168190Reference
1967
189008Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)