Compare/Cockshutt 1900 vs Cockshutt 1955
Search

Cockshutt 1900 vs Cockshutt 1955

Verdict: Cockshutt 1900 vs Cockshutt 1955

The Cockshutt 1900 and the Cockshutt 1955 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 1955 leads on rated power with 108 hp against 99 hp. Cockshutt 1955 is the lighter machine (5,103 kg vs 5,443 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 1955 is the newer design (1970 vs 1963). In short: choose the Cockshutt 1955 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 1900 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt 1900 Tractor
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt 1955 Tractor
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
99 hp
108 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CockshuttReference
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
Gear 1-Direct used for pull test.Reference
The Hydraul-Shift overs a power shift between over-, under-, and direct-drive for each gear.Reference
Steering
power (late)Reference
Engine
Drawbar (tested)
65.8 kWReference
67.4 kWReference
Displacement
3.5 LReference
5.1 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 114 mmReference
98 x 111 mmReference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
dryReference
Compression
21:1Reference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2400Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
13.7 LReference
Coolant capacity
19.9 LReference
18.9 LReference
Max power
65.8 kWReference
67.4 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
75.0 kWReference
80.7 kWReference
Fuel tank
132.5 LReference
Transmission
Type
partial power shiftReference
partial power shiftReference
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
330mm cerametallic discReference
Transmission
Hydra-PowerReference
Hydraul-ShiftReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (tested)
75.0 kWReference
80.7 kWReference
Hydraulic system
18.9 LReference
Capacity
18.9 LReference
Pump flow
49.2 lpmReference
75.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
II/IIIReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2000Reference
PTO (claimed)
80.5 kWReference
Rear lift
2721 kgReference
Capacities
Fuel
119.2 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
247 cmReference
Weight
5443 kgReference
5103 kgReference
Front tire
7.50-18Reference
11L-15Reference
Rear tire
18-26Reference
20.8-38Reference
Ag front
7.50-18Reference
11L-15Reference
Ag rear
15-34Reference
20.8-38Reference
Length
397 cmReference
Width
246 cmReference
204 cmReference
Height (steering wheel)
193 cmReference
217 cmReference
Operating weight
5443 kgReference
5103 kgReference
Ballasted weight
8325 kgReference
7357 kgReference
Ground clearance
60 cmReference
Front tread
176 cmReference
Rear tread
187/208 cmReference
144 to 303 cmReference
2WD Wheelbase
261 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
219 cmReference
2WD Length
405 cmReference
4WD Length
387 cmReference
2WD Ground clearance
64 cmReference
4WD Ground clearance
34 cmReference
2WD Front tread
156 to 222 cmReference
4WD Front tread
152/179/203 cmReference
1900 Serial Numbers
1960
90-532 (A)Reference
1961
111-028 (A)Reference
1962
124-396 (B)Reference
1963
138-440 (C)Reference
1964
141-168 (C)Reference
Location:
Serial plate on instrument panel.Reference
Final
148-651 (C)Reference
253-050Reference
Test results
Fuel use
27.3 l/hourReference
26.5 l/hourReference
Max pull
7707 kgReference
5733 kgReference
1955 Serial Numbers
1970
222-304Reference
1971
226-858Reference
1972
232-958Reference
1973
239-032Reference
1974
247-871Reference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)