Compare/Cockshutt 1900 vs Cockshutt 2050
Search

Cockshutt 1900 vs Cockshutt 2050

Verdict: Cockshutt 1900 vs Cockshutt 2050

The Cockshutt 1900 and the Cockshutt 2050 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 2050 leads on rated power with 119 hp against 99 hp. Cockshutt 1900 is the lighter machine (5,443 kg vs 6,595 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 2050 is the newer design (1968 vs 1963). In short: choose the Cockshutt 2050 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 1900 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt 1900 Tractor
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt 2050 Tractor
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
99 hp
119 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CockshuttReference
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
Gear 1-Direct used for pull test.Reference
Oliver Hydraul-Shift provides a clutchless, on-the-move shift to an over- and under-drive for each of six forward gears.Reference
Steering
power (late)Reference
Total built
383Reference
Final drives
planetaryReference
Engine
Drawbar (tested)
65.8 kWReference
71.9 kWReference
Displacement
3.5 LReference
7.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 114 mmReference
116 x 124 mmReference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
dryReference
Compression
21:1Reference
18.0:1Reference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2400Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
13.7 LReference
18.0 LReference
Coolant capacity
19.9 LReference
26.5 LReference
Max power
65.8 kWReference
71.9 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
75.0 kWReference
88.6 kWReference
Fuel tank
295.2 LReference
Firing order
1-5-3-6-2-4Reference
Transmission
Type
partial power shiftReference
partial powershiftReference
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
330mm cerametallic discReference
Transmission
Hydra-PowerReference
Hydraul-ShiftReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (tested)
75.0 kWReference
88.6 kWReference
Hydraulic system
18.9 LReference
Capacity
18.9 LReference
Pump flow
49.2 lpmReference
34.1 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
IIIReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000Reference
540/1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2000Reference
PTO (claimed)
88.0 kWReference
Pressure
141.3 barReference
Valves
2 to 4Reference
Control
position and draft controlReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2721 kgReference
Capacities
Fuel
119.2 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
247 cmReference
248 cmReference
Weight
5443 kgReference
6595 kgReference
Front tire
7.50-18Reference
11.00-16Reference
Rear tire
18-26Reference
18.4-38Reference
Ag front
7.50-18Reference
11.00-16Reference
Ag rear
15-34Reference
24.5-32Reference
Length
397 cmReference
412 cmReference
Width
246 cmReference
Height (steering wheel)
193 cmReference
217 cmReference
Operating weight
5443 kgReference
6595 kgReference
Ballasted weight
8325 kgReference
8568 kgReference
Ground clearance
60 cmReference
48 cmReference
Front tread
176 cmReference
Rear tread
187/208 cmReference
2WD Front tread
152 to 203 cmReference
4WD Front tread
167/179/203 cmReference
2WD Rear tread
154 to 231 cmReference
4WD Rear tread
156 to 283 cmReference
1900 Serial Numbers
1960
90-532 (A)Reference
1961
111-028 (A)Reference
1962
124-396 (B)Reference
1963
138-440 (C)Reference
1964
141-168 (C)Reference
Location:
Serial plate on instrument panel.Reference
Final
148-651 (C)Reference
213932Reference
Test results
Fuel use
27.3 l/hourReference
28.8 l/hourReference
Max pull
7707 kgReference
5997 kgReference
2050 Serial Numbers
1968
204444Reference
1969
212560Reference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)