Compare/Cockshutt 1950 vs Cockshutt 2150
Search

Cockshutt 1950 vs Cockshutt 2150

Verdict: Cockshutt 1950 vs Cockshutt 2150

The Cockshutt 1950 and the Cockshutt 2150 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 2150 leads on rated power with 131 hp against 106 hp. Cockshutt 2150 is the lighter machine (5,892 kg vs 11,955 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 2150 is the newer design (1968 vs 1964). In short: choose the Cockshutt 2150 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 1950 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt 1950 Tractor
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt 2150 Tractor
Cockshutt
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
106 hp
131 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
Cockshutt (a part of White)Reference
The Oliver Hydra-Power transmission provided a power shift to a lower speed for each gear.Reference
Oliver Hydraul-Shift provides a clutchless, on-the-move shift to an over- and under-drive for each of six forward gears.Reference
Steering
hydraulic powerReference
Original price
$13,800 (1969)Reference
Final drives
planetaryReference
Engine
Drawbar (tested)
73.1 kWReference
81.7 kWReference
Displacement
3.5 LReference
7.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 114 mmReference
116 x 124 mmReference
Air cleaner
dual dry elementReference
dual dry typeReference
Compression
21:1Reference
18.0:1Reference
Rated RPM
2400Reference
2400Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Power at rated engine speed
78.9 kWReference
98.0 kWReference
Max power
69.5 kWReference
81.7 kWReference
Fuel tank
295.2 LReference
Firing order
1-5-3-6-2-4Reference
Oil capacity
18.0 LReference
Coolant capacity
26.5 LReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
Transmission
Hydra-PowerReference
Hydraul-ShiftReference
Clutch
355.6mm cerametallic discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
78.3 kWReference
97.7 kWReference
PTO (tested)
78.9 kWReference
98.0 kWReference
Hydraulic system
13.2 LReference
Type
partial power shiftReference
partial powershiftReference
Capacity
13.2 LReference
Pump flow
44.3 lpmReference
34.1 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
IIIReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540Reference
540/1000Reference
Engine RPM
540@2400Reference
Pressure
141.3 barReference
Valves
2 to 4Reference
Control
position and draft controlReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2721 kgReference
Capacities
Fuel
104.1 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
216 cmReference
248 cmReference
Weight
11955 to 12975 poundsReference
5892 kgReference
Front tire
11.00-16Reference
11.00-16Reference
Rear tire
23.1-34Reference
18.4-38Reference
Ag front
11.00-16Reference
11.00-16Reference
Ag rear
23.1-34Reference
24.5-32Reference
Front tread
167/179 cmReference
Rear tread
187/208 cmReference
Operating
5422 kgReference
Ballasted
9037 kgReference
Length
412 cmReference
Height (steering wheel)
217 cmReference
Operating weight
5892 kgReference
Ballasted weight
9582 kgReference
Ground clearance
48 cmReference
2WD Front tread
152 to 203 cmReference
4WD Front tread
167/179/203 cmReference
2WD Rear tread
154 to 231 cmReference
4WD Rear tread
156 to 283 cmReference
Cockshutt 1950 attachments
1950 Serial Numbers
1964
150492Reference
1965
153016Reference
1966
168190Reference
1967
189008Reference
Final
199186Reference
216595Reference
Test results
Fuel use
27.6 l/hourReference
32.6 l/hourReference
Max pull
7972 kgReference
7488 kgReference
2150 Serial Numbers
1968
204480Reference
1969
212554Reference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)