Compare/Cockshutt 40 vs Cockshutt 770
Search

Cockshutt 40 vs Cockshutt 770

Verdict: Cockshutt 40 vs Cockshutt 770

The Cockshutt 40 and the Cockshutt 770 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 770 leads on rated power with 47 hp against 43 hp. Cockshutt 40 is the lighter machine (2,406 kg vs 2,494 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 770 is the newer design (1963 vs 1949). In short: choose the Cockshutt 770 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 40 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt 40 Tractor
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt 770 Tractor
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
43 hp
47 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CockshuttReference
CockshuttReference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Diesel 6-speed 2WDApril 23 - May 7, 1958Link: Nebraska Tractor Test 649 fileReference
Steering
manualReference
Variants
40
Buda engineReference
40D4
Perkins engineReference
Engine
Drawbar (tested)
28.2 kWReference
33.1 kWReference
Belt (tested)
32.3 kWReference
37.3 kWReference
Displacement
3.8 LReference
3.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
87 x 105 mmReference
89 x 95 mmReference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
Compression
6.2:1Reference
16:1Reference
Rated RPM
1650Reference
1750Reference
Starter volts
6Reference
12Reference
Belt power (max)
32.3 kWReference
36.4 kWReference
Max power
28.2 kWReference
33.1 kWReference
Gas Fuel tank
76.8 LReference
Diesel Fuel tank
68.9 LReference
Plows
3-4Reference
Coolant capacity
17.0 LReference
Transmission
Type
gearReference
sliding gearReference
Gears
6 forward and 2 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
dry discReference
Transmission
Power-BoosterReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
32.1 kWReference
35.0 kWReference
Rear PTO Type
540Reference
Rear Type
I/IIReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
220 cmReference
Weight
2406 kgReference
2494 kgReference
Operating weight
2406 kgReference
2494 kgReference
Ballasted weight
3797 kgReference
4134 kgReference
Front tread
135/149 cmReference
Rear tread
156 to 200 cmReference
Front tire
6.00-16Reference
Rear tire
15.5-38Reference
Ag front
6.00-16Reference
Ag rear
15.5-38Reference
40 Serial Number Location
40 Serial Numbers
1949
101Reference
1950
194Reference
1951
4098Reference
1952
6896Reference
1953
10472Reference
1954
11363Reference
1955
20001Reference
1956
30001Reference
1957
40001Reference
1958
50001Reference
60504Reference
Final
50372Reference
193365 (47 prefix)Reference
Test results
Belt fuel use (max)
17.0 l/hourReference
12.9 l/hourReference
Max pull
2512 kgReference
3237 kgReference
770 Serial Numbers
1959
71001Reference
1960
84554Reference
1961
111472Reference
1962
117600Reference
1963
127319Reference
1964
141901Reference
1965
153255Reference
1966
171515Reference
1967
183649Reference
Location:
Bottom of dashboard below steering wheel.Reference
Electrical
Ground
positiveReference
Charging system
generatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)