Compare/Cockshutt 560 vs Cockshutt 770
Search

Cockshutt 560 vs Cockshutt 770

Verdict: Cockshutt 560 vs Cockshutt 770

The Cockshutt 560 and the Cockshutt 770 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Cockshutt 560 leads on rated power with 49 hp against 47 hp. Cockshutt 770 is the lighter machine (2,494 kg vs 3,265 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Cockshutt 560 holds more fuel (100.3 L vs 76.8 L) for longer stints between fills. Cockshutt 770 is the newer design (1963 vs 1958). In short: choose the Cockshutt 560 for outright pulling power, or the Cockshutt 770 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Cockshutt 560 Tractor
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Cockshutt 770 Tractor
Cockshutt
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
49 hp
47 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
CockshuttReference
CockshuttReference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Diesel 6-speed 2WDApril 23 - May 7, 1958Link: Nebraska Tractor Test 649 fileReference
Total built
2,910Reference
Steering
power assistReference
Engine
Fuel tank
100.3 LReference
Drawbar (claimed)
33.6 kWReference
Plows
4Reference
3-4Reference
Drawbar (tested)
34.0 kWReference
33.1 kWReference
Belt (tested)
36.2 kWReference
37.3 kWReference
Displacement
4.4 LReference
3.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
108 x 121 mmReference
89 x 95 mmReference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
Compression
16:1Reference
16:1Reference
Rated RPM
1650Reference
1750Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Belt power (max)
36.2 kWReference
36.4 kWReference
Max power
34.0 kWReference
33.1 kWReference
Gas Fuel tank
76.8 LReference
Diesel Fuel tank
68.9 LReference
Coolant capacity
17.0 LReference
Transmission
Type
unsynchronized gearReference
sliding gearReference
Gears
6 forward and 2 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
Transmission
Power-BoosterReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
36.5 kWReference
35.0 kWReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540Reference
Rear Type
I/IIReference
Dimensions
Tricycle Wheelbase
230 cmReference
Row-crop Wheelbase
243 cmReference
Standard Wheelbase
248 cmReference
Weight
3265 kgReference
2494 kgReference
Front tire
6.00x16Reference
6.00-16Reference
Rear tire
13.6/12x38Reference
15.5-38Reference
Ag front
7.50x16Reference
6.00-16Reference
Ag rear
18x26Reference
15.5-38Reference
Tricycle Length
355 cmReference
Row-crop Length
368 cmReference
Standard Length
345 cmReference
Height (hood)
175 cmReference
Ballasted weight
4284 kgReference
4134 kgReference
Row-crop Front tread
147 to 208 cmReference
Standard Front tread
135 to 144 cmReference
Row-crop Rear tread
147 to 223 cmReference
Operating weight
2494 kgReference
560 Serial Numbers
1958
CM1001Reference
60504Reference
1959
CN5001Reference
71001Reference
1960
CO7001Reference
84554Reference
1961
CP1001Reference
111472Reference
Location:
Right side of frameReference
Bottom of dashboard below steering wheel.Reference
Test results
Belt fuel use (max)
10.2 l/hourReference
12.9 l/hourReference
Max pull
3041 kgReference
3237 kgReference
770 Serial Numbers
1962
117600Reference
1963
127319Reference
1964
141901Reference
1965
153255Reference
1966
171515Reference
1967
183649Reference
Final
193365 (47 prefix)Reference
Electrical
Ground
positiveReference
Charging system
generatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)