Compare/David Brown 25 vs David Brown 850
Search

David Brown 25 vs David Brown 850

Verdict: David Brown 25 vs David Brown 850

The David Brown 25 and the David Brown 850 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. David Brown 850 leads on rated power with 34 hp against 32 hp. David Brown 25 is the lighter machine (1,685 kg vs 3,750 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. David Brown 25 holds more fuel (48.1 L vs 40.1 L) for longer stints between fills. David Brown 850 is the newer design (1960 vs 1953). In short: choose the David Brown 850 for outright pulling power, or the David Brown 25 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
David Brown 25 Tractor
David Brown
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
David Brown 850 Tractor
David Brown
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
32 hp
34 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
David BrownReference
David BrownReference
Steering
manualReference
Final drives
spur gearReference
Variants
25D
diesel engineReference
25C
petrol engineReference
Engine
Gear 2 used for pull test.Reference
With 10-28 rear tires.Reference
Fuel tank
48.1 LReference
40.1 LReference
Kerosene Fuel tank
45.0 LReference
Aux. fuel
6.8 LReference
Engine
23.9 kWReference
26.1 kWReference
Gas Drawbar (claimed)
18.0 kWReference
Kerosene Drawbar (claimed)
16.9 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
19.3 kWReference
23.1 kWReference
Belt (tested)
26.0 kWReference
Displacement
2.5 LReference
2.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
89 x 102 mmReference
89 x 102 mmReference
Power
23.9 kWReference
26.1 kWReference
Compression
4.7:1Reference
6.25:1Reference
Rated RPM
1600Reference
2000Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
oil bathReference
Belt power (max)
26.0 kWReference
Max power
19.3 kWReference
20.6 kWReference
Drawbar (claimed)
22.4 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Idle RPM
700-2000Reference
Oil capacity
9.6 LReference
Coolant capacity
13.6 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
23.9 kWReference
Transmission
Type
gearReference
unsynchronized gearReference
Gears
6 forward and 2 reverseReference
6 forward and 2 reverseReference
Clutch
dry plateReference
dry discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Total flow
36.0 lpmReference
Rear lift
589 kgReference
Rear PTO Type
540Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
PTO (claimed)
24.6 kWReference
PTO (tested)
25.0 kWReference
Rear Type
IReference
Rear PTO
liveReference
Engine RPM
1000@2000Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
21.3 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
189 cmReference
191 cmReference
Weight
1685 kgReference
3750 to 4179 poundsReference
Front tire
6.00-19Reference
5.00-15Reference
Rear tire
11-28Reference
10-28Reference
Ag front
6.00-19Reference
5.00-15Reference
Ag rear
11-28Reference
10-28Reference
Length
287 cmReference
288 cmReference
Ground clearance
39 cmReference
Front tread
125 to 157 cmReference
132/142/152/162/172/182 cmReference
Rear tread
121 to 172 cmReference
132/142/152/162/172/182 cmReference
Height (hood)
131 cmReference
Shipping
1701 kgReference
Gas Operating
1857 kgReference
Diesel Operating
1895 kgReference
Ballasted
2664 kgReference
25 Serial Numbers
1954
P25/15896Reference
1955
P25/16998Reference
1956
P25/19041Reference
1957
P25/?????Reference
1958
P25/?????Reference
Final
P25/21318Reference
Electrical
Charging system
generatorReference
Test results
Belt fuel use (max)
12.5 l/hourReference
Max pull
1482 kgReference
Fuel use
9.8 l/hourReference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)