Compare/Deutz-Fahr Agrotron TTV 1130 vs Deutz-Fahr DX 130

Deutz-Fahr Agrotron TTV 1130 vs Deutz-Fahr DX 130

Verdict: Deutz-Fahr Agrotron TTV 1130 vs Deutz-Fahr DX 130

The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron TTV 1130 and the Deutz-Fahr DX 130 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Deutz-Fahr Agrotron TTV 1130 leads on rated power with 125 hp against 121 hp. Deutz-Fahr Agrotron TTV 1130 is the lighter machine (6,251 kg vs 6,323 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Deutz-Fahr Agrotron TTV 1130 holds more fuel (310.0 L vs 151.4 L) for longer stints between fills. Deutz-Fahr Agrotron TTV 1130 is the newer design (2001 vs 1981). In short: choose the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron TTV 1130 for outright pulling power, or the Deutz-Fahr DX 130 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Deutz-Fahr

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Deutz-Fahr

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

125 hp

121 hp

Confidence

98%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

Deutz-FahrReference

Final drives

—

planetaryReference

Differential lock

—

hydraulic foot-operatedReference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

liquid-cooledReference

Four gears (1-4) in three ranges (low, medium, high) with two-speed power shift.Reference

Fuel tank

310.0 LReference

249.8 LReference

Engine

93.2 kWReference

—

Displacement

7.1 LReference

6.1 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 130 mmReference

102 x 125 mmReference

Power

93.2 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2300Reference

Torque

497.1 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1380Reference

—

Starter type

electricReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

—

76.5 kWReference

Compression

—

15.5:1Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Oil capacity

—

53.0 LReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

90.4 kWReference

Max power

—

76.5 kWReference

Transmission

ZF EccomReference

—

Type

infinitely variable transmissionReference

two-speed power shiftReference

Gears

infinite forward and reverseReference

24 forward and 8 reverseReference

Clutch

—

hydraulic dry discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Pump flow

120.0 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

III/IIReference

Rear lift

7241 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/750/1000/1250Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

89.5 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

90.4 kWReference

Valves

—

1 to 3Reference

Total flow

—

102.2 lpmReference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

6500 kgReference

Engine RPM

—

1000@2070Reference

Power at rated PTO speed

—

90.5 kWReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

277 cmReference

275 cmReference

Weight

6251 kgReference

6323 kgReference

Front tire

480/70R30Reference

11.00-16Reference

Rear tire

20.8R38Reference

18.4-38 (2WD)Reference

Ag front

480/70R30Reference

—

Ag rear

20.8R38Reference

—

Length

468 cmReference

—

Height

294 cmReference

287 cmReference

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 14.9-28. Rear: 20.8-38 (4WD)Reference

Width

—

236 cmReference

Operating weight

—

6323 kgReference

Ballasted weight

—

7996 kgReference

Rear tread

—

160 to 218 cmReference

Electrical

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Ground

—

negativeReference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

—

26.1 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

6534 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.