Search
Farmall 240 vs Farmall Super FC
Verdict: Farmall 240 vs Farmall Super FC
The Farmall 240 and the Farmall Super FC are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Farmall 240 leads on rated power with 28 hp against 26 hp. Farmall 240 holds more fuel (60.6 L vs 41.6 L) for longer stints between fills. Farmall 240 is the newer design (1958 vs 1951). In short: choose the Farmall 240 for outright pulling power, or the Farmall Super FC if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Farmall
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Farmall
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
28 hp
26 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
Farmall (a part of International Harvester)Reference
Farmall (a part of International Harvester)Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
With 9x36 rear tires.Reference
Steering
—
manualReference
Variants
International 240
utility tractorReference
—
Farmall 240
row-crop tractorReference
—
Super FC-C
—
gasolineReference
Super FC-D
—
dieselReference
Super FC-E
—
tractor-fuelReference
Engine
Fuel tank
60.6 LReference
41.6 LReference
Drawbar (claimed)
20.9 kWReference
—
Belt (claimed)
23.1 kWReference
—
Plows
2Reference
—
Drawbar (tested)
20.6 kWReference
—
Belt (tested)
23.1 kWReference
—
Displacement
2.0 LReference
2.0 LReference
Bore/Stroke
79 x 102 mmReference
79 x 102 mmReference
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
—
Rated RPM
2000Reference
1650Reference
Firing order
1-3-4-2Reference
—
Starter volts
6Reference
—
Oil capacity
18.9 LReference
18.9 LReference
Coolant capacity
12.1 LReference
12.3 LReference
Belt power (max)
23.1 kWReference
—
Max power
20.6 kWReference
—
Engine
—
19.1 kWReference
Sparkplug
—
AC-85SReference
Sparkplug gap
—
0.635 mmReference
Intake valve clearance
—
0.356 mmReference
Exhaust valve clearance
—
0.356 mmReference
Power
—
19.1 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
4 forward and 1 reverseReference
4 forward and 1 reverseReference
Clutch
228.6mm dry discReference
9-inch dry discReference
Oil type
—
SAE 90Reference
PTO & Hydraulics
Type
gearReference
unsynchronized gearReference
Pump flow
35.2 lpmReference
—
Rear PTO
transmissionReference
—
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540Reference
Engine RPM
540@1650Reference
—
Dimensions
Wheelbase
209 cmReference
232 cmReference
Weight
3340 to 3763 poundsReference
—
Front tire
5-15Reference
4.00x15Reference
Rear tire
11.2-36Reference
9.00x36Reference
Ag front
7.50-10Reference
4.00x15Reference
Ag rear
12.4-36Reference
9.00x36Reference
Height (steering wheel)
162 cmReference
184 cmReference
Clearance (rear axle)
59 cmReference
57 cmReference
Front tread
132 to 208 cmReference
150 to 211 cmReference
Rear tread
121 to 193 cmReference
142 to 198 cmReference
Shipping
1515 kgReference
—
Operating
1706 kgReference
—
Ballasted
2760 kgReference
—
Length
—
328 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
—
211 cmReference
Farmall 240 attachments
240 Serial Numbers
1958
501Reference
—
1959
1777Reference
—
1960
3415Reference
—
1961
3989Reference
—
Capacities
Diameter
20 cmReference
21 cmReference
Width
15 cmReference
198 cmReference
RPM
1652Reference
1363Reference
Speed
1054.61 meters/minReference
924.46 meters/minReference
Attachment overview
Test results
Belt fuel use (max)
10.2 l/hourReference
—
Max pull
1969 kgReference
—
Speeds
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.