Compare/Ford 2000 vs Ford 3900

Ford 2000 vs Ford 3900

Verdict: Ford 2000 vs Ford 3900

The Ford 2000 and the Ford 3900 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Ford 2000 leads on rated power with 48 hp against 47 hp. Ford 3900 is the lighter machine (2,161 kg vs 3,020 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Ford 3900 is the newer design (1975 vs 1962). In short: choose the Ford 2000 for outright pulling power, or the Ford 3900 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Ford

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Ford

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

48 hp

47 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

FordReference

Auxiliary over-under transmission adds additional ranges to the base four-speed transmission.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Utility Steering

manualReference

—

Row-crop Steering

powerReference

—

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Variants

2000 Offset

cultivating tractorReference

—

Engine

Engine (gross)

36.1 kWReference

35.0 kWReference

Drawbar (claimed)

20.9 kWReference

—

Displacement

2.4 LReference

2.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

90 x 91 mmReference

107 x 107 mmReference

Power (gross)

31.8 kWReference

35.0 kWReference

Air cleaner

oil bathReference

dryReference

Compression

7.5:1Reference

16.3:1Reference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

2000Reference

Torque

150.9 NmReference

179.5 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

1200Reference

Firing order

1-2-4-3Reference

—

Starter

electricReference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

10.4 LReference

13.0 LReference

Coolant capacity

14.2 LReference

10.0 LReference

Fuel tank

—

49.2 LReference

Fuel system

—

indirect injectionReference

Transmission

Gears

12 forward and 3 reverseReference

8 forward and 2 reverseReference

Clutch

228.6mm dry discsReference

280mm dry discReference

Transmission

Over-UnderReference

—

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

23.1 kWReference

—

Hydraulic system

7.6 LReference

—

Type

full power shiftReference

gearReference

Capacity

7.6 LReference

—

Pressure

137.9 barReference

—

Valves

2Reference

—

Pump flow

15.1 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IReference

Rear lift (at ends)

1070 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

Control

—

position and draft controlReference

Rear lift

—

1549 kgReference

Engine RPM

—

540@1800Reference

Capacities

Fuel

49.2 LReference

—

Dimensions

Wheelbase

189 cmReference

197 cmReference

Weight

3020 to 3362 poundsReference

2161 kgReference

Front tire

5.50-16Reference

6.00x19Reference

Rear tire

12.4-28Reference

12.4/11x36Reference

Ag front

5.50-16Reference

—

Ag rear

16.9-24Reference

—

Length

288 cmReference

342 cmReference

Width

222 cmReference

185 cmReference

Height (steering wheel)

144 cmReference

—

Utility Weight

1369 kgReference

—

Row-crop Weight

1525 kgReference

—

Utility Ground clearance

52 cmReference

—

Utility Front tread

132 to 203 cmReference

—

Row-crop Front tread

132 to 205 cmReference

—

Utility Rear tread

132 to 193 cmReference

—

Row-crop Rear tread

142 to 213 cmReference

—

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 6.00x19. Rear: 12.4/11x36Reference

Height (ROPS)

—

230 cmReference

Ford 2000 attachments

2000 Serial Number Location

2000 Serial Numbers

1962

1001Reference

—

1963

11949Reference

—

1964

38931Reference

—

Electrical

Ground

negative (12V)Reference

—

Charging system

generatorReference

alternatorReference

Battery volts

12 (diesel)Reference

12Reference

Charging amps

—

28Reference

Battery AH

—

128Reference

Attachment overview

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.