Search
Ford 2600 vs Ford 3415
Verdict: Ford 2600 vs Ford 3415
The Ford 2600 and the Ford 3415 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Ford 3415 leads on rated power with 38 hp against 37 hp. Ford 2600 is the lighter machine (1,640 kg vs 1,859 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Ford 3415 is the newer design (1993 vs 1975). In short: choose the Ford 3415 for outright pulling power, or the Ford 2600 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Ford
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Ford
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
37 hp
38 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
FordReference
ShibauraReference
With 12.4-28 rear tires.Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Differential lock
mechanical rearReference
—
Steering
powerReference
—
Distributor
—
FordReference
Engine
Engine (gross)
27.2 kWReference
—
Engine (net)
25.6 kWReference
—
Drawbar (tested)
21.4 kWReference
—
Displacement
2.6 LReference
2.2 LReference
Bore/Stroke
107 x 97 mmReference
84 x 100 mmReference
Power (net)
24.6 kWReference
—
Power (gross)
26.5 kWReference
—
Air cleaner
dryReference
—
Pre-heating
coolant heaterReference
—
Compression
7.75:1Reference
—
Rated RPM
2000Reference
—
Torque
136.3 NmReference
—
Torque RPM
1350Reference
—
Firing order
1-2-3Reference
—
Starter
electricReference
—
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
13.1 LReference
—
Coolant capacity
10.4 LReference
—
Power at rated engine speed
24.2 kWReference
—
Max power
20.5 kWReference
—
Fuel tank
—
42.0 LReference
Engine
—
32.8 kWReference
Power
—
32.8 kWReference
Transmission
Type
mechanical shuttleReference
open centerReference
Gears
6 forward and 4 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
279mm dry discReference
—
Transmission
Dual-RangeReference
—
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
23.9 kWReference
28.3 kWReference
PTO (tested)
25.5 kWReference
—
Hydraulic system
23.3 LReference
—
Capacity
23.3 LReference
—
Pressure
144.8 barReference
—
Pump flow
32.2 lpmReference
24.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
IReference
IReference
Control
top-link draft sensingReference
—
Rear lift
895 kgReference
1573 kgReference
Rear PTO
liveReference
liveReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
22.9 kWReference
—
Capacities
Fuel
49.2 LReference
—
Dimensions
Wheelbase
192 cmReference
189 cmReference
Weight
1640 kgReference
1859 kgReference
Front tire
5.50-16Reference
6.00-16Reference
Rear tire
12.4-28Reference
13.6-28Reference
Ag front
5.50-16Reference
6.00-16Reference
Ag rear
12.4-28Reference
13.6-28Reference
Length
321 cmReference
—
Width
132 cmReference
—
Height (hood)
133 cmReference
—
Height (cab)
248 cmReference
—
Shipping weight
1640 kgReference
—
Clearance (front axle)
54 cmReference
—
Clearance (rear axle)
32 cmReference
—
Front tread
132 to 203 cmReference
—
Rear tread
132 to 203 cmReference
—
Ford 2600 attachments
2600 Serial Numbers
1975
C450700Reference
—
1976
C490300Reference
—
1977
C527300Reference
—
1978
C560500Reference
—
1979
C595800Reference
—
1980
C635700Reference
—
1981
C660700Reference
—
1982
C682000Reference
—
Location:
Right side of tractor behind starter.Reference
left side of transmissionReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
—
Charging amps
51Reference
—
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Gas Battery AH
77Reference
—
Diesel Battery AH
128Reference
—
Attachment overview
Test results
Fuel use
7.9 l/hourReference
—
Max pull
2019 kgReference
—
Speeds
3415 Serial Numbers
1993
—
UX20001Reference
1994
—
UX20798Reference
1995
—
UX21715Reference
1996
—
UX22323Reference
1997
—
UX22504Reference
1998
—
UX22858Reference
1999
—
UX23290Reference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.