Search
Ford 3900 vs Ford 661
Verdict: Ford 3900 vs Ford 661
The Ford 3900 and the Ford 661 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Ford 661 leads on rated power with 48 hp against 47 hp. Ford 661 is the lighter machine (1,506 kg vs 2,161 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Ford 3900 is the newer design (1975 vs 1957). In short: choose the Ford 661 for outright pulling power, or the Ford 3900 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Ford
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Ford
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
47 hp
48 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Manufacturer
FordReference
FordReference
liquid-cooledReference
LP gasReference
Differential lock
mechanical rearReference
—
Steering
—
power assist optionalReference
Engine
Fuel tank
49.2 LReference
—
Engine (gross)
35.0 kWReference
36.1 kWReference
Displacement
2.9 LReference
2.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
107 x 107 mmReference
90 x 91 mmReference
Power (gross)
35.0 kWReference
31.8 kWReference
Fuel system
indirect injectionReference
—
Air cleaner
dryReference
oil bathReference
Compression
16.3:1Reference
16.8:1Reference
Rated RPM
2000Reference
2200Reference
Torque
179.5 NmReference
171.9 NmReference
Torque RPM
1200Reference
1600Reference
Starter
electricReference
—
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
13.0 LReference
5.7 LReference
Coolant capacity
10.0 LReference
14.2 LReference
Belt (claimed)
—
23.9 kWReference
Plows
—
2 (14-inch)Reference
Emissions
—
Tier 0Reference
Firing order
—
1-2-4-3Reference
Sparkplug
—
14MMReference
Sparkplug gap
—
0.711 mmReference
Oil change
—
100 hReference
Transmission
Type
gearReference
gearReference
Gears
8 forward and 2 reverseReference
5 forward and 1 reverseReference
Clutch
280mm dry discReference
228.6mm dry discsReference
Oil type
—
SAE 80 Mild EPReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Rear Type
IReference
IReference
Control
position and draft controlReference
position and draft controlReference
Rear lift
1549 kgReference
567 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
liveReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540 (1.375)Reference
Engine RPM
540@1800Reference
—
Hydraulic system
—
7.6 LReference
Capacity
—
7.6 LReference
Total flow
—
15.1 lpmReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
197 cmReference
—
Weight
2161 kgReference
1506 kgReference
Front tire
6.00x19Reference
5.50-16Reference
Rear tire
12.4/11x36Reference
11-28Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 6.00x19. Rear: 12.4/11x36Reference
—
Length
342 cmReference
—
Width
185 cmReference
—
Height (ROPS)
230 cmReference
—
Ag front
—
5.50-16Reference
Ag rear
—
11-28Reference
Front tread
—
132 to 203 cmReference
Rear tread
—
132 to 193 cmReference
Electrical
Charging system
alternatorReference
generatorReference
Charging amps
28Reference
20Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12 (diesel)Reference
Battery AH
128Reference
135 (12V)Reference
Ground
—
negative (12V)Reference
Variants
611
—
Select-O-Speed, no PTOReference
621
—
Four-speed, no PTO or 3-pointReference
631
—
Four-speed, no PTOReference
641
—
Four-speedReference
651
—
Five-speedReference
661
—
Five-speed, live PTOReference
671
—
Select-O-SpeedReference
681
—
Select-O-Speed, dual-speed PTOReference
Capacities
Fuel
—
49.2 LReference
Rear axle
—
7.6 LReference
661 Serial Number Location
661 Serial Numbers
1957
—
1001Reference
1958
—
11977Reference
1959
—
58312Reference
1960
—
105943Reference
1961
—
131427Reference
1962
—
155531Reference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.


