Compare/Ford 8670 vs Ford FW-35
Search

Ford 8670 vs Ford FW-35

Verdict: Ford 8670 vs Ford FW-35

The Ford 8670 and the Ford FW-35 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Ford FW-35 leads on rated power with 168 hp against 148 hp. Ford FW-35 is the lighter machine (9,300 kg vs 15,800 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Ford 8670 is the newer design (1993 vs 1986). In short: choose the Ford FW-35 for outright pulling power, or the Ford 8670 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Ford 8670 Tractor
Ford
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Ford FW-35 Tractor
Ford
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
148 hp
168 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
FordReference
WaltannaReference
Creeper range added to standard power shift transmission. With tractor in neutral and inching pedal pressed, toggle button is used to enter/exit creeper range.Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Distributor
FordReference
Variants
2145
similar Buhler Versatile modelReference
Engine
Engine
126.8 kWReference
145.4 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
98.5 kWReference
Displacement
7.5 LReference
6.6 LReference
Bore/Stroke
112 x 127 mmReference
112 x 112 mmReference
Power
126.8 kWReference
145.4 kWReference
Compression
17.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2200Reference
Firing order
1-5-3-6-2-4Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
Starter power
4.5 kWReference
Coolant capacity
25.0 LReference
Intake valve clearance
0.356 mmReference
Exhaust valve clearance
0.432 mmReference
Oil capacity
20.8 LReference
Max power
98.5 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
110.1 kWReference
Fuel tank
495.1 LReference
Torque
694.3 NmReference
Torque RPM
1600Reference
Starter type
electricReference
Transmission
Gears
32 forward and 18 reverseReference
16 forward and 4 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
108.1 kWReference
125.0 kWReference
PTO (tested)
125.0 kWReference
Hydraulic system
117.0 LReference
Type
creeperReference
two-speed power shiftReference
Capacity
117.0 LReference
Pressure
189.6 barReference
172.4 barReference
Valves
3Reference
3Reference
Pump flow
90.8 lpmReference
75.7 lpmReference
Total flow
208.2 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
IIIReference
Rear lift
4536 kgReference
6860 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@1903Reference
1000@1920Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
122.1 kWReference
Capacities
Fuel
416.4 LReference
Front hubs
1.6 LReference
Front diff.
12.3 LReference
Max capacity
9865 kgReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
311 cmReference
342 cmReference
Weight
15800 to 18200 poundsReference
9300 kgReference
Front tire
14L-16.1Reference
24.5x32Reference
Rear tire
18.4R42Reference
24.5x32Reference
Ag front
16.9R28 (4WD)Reference
24.5x32Reference
Ag rear
18.4R42Reference
24.5x32Reference
Length
499 cmReference
660 cmReference
Width
245 cmReference
264 cmReference
Height (cab)
308 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
315 cmReference
339 cmReference
Clearance (front axle)
50 cmReference
Clearance (drawbar)
47 cmReference
Front tread
157 to 220 cmReference
157 to 274 cmReference
Rear tread
153 to 314 cmReference
157 to 274 cmReference
Operating
8255 kgReference
Ford 8670 attachments
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
130Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery CCA
950Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
34.8 l/hourReference
Max pull
7885 kgReference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)