Compare/Ford 8770 vs Ford FW-35
Search

Ford 8770 vs Ford FW-35

Verdict: Ford 8770 vs Ford FW-35

The Ford 8770 and the Ford FW-35 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Ford FW-35 leads on rated power with 168 hp against 165 hp. Ford FW-35 is the lighter machine (9,300 kg vs 16,600 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Ford 8770 is the newer design (1993 vs 1986). In short: choose the Ford FW-35 for outright pulling power, or the Ford 8770 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Ford 8770 Tractor
Ford
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Ford FW-35 Tractor
Ford
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
165 hp
168 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
FordReference
WaltannaReference
Creeper range added to standard power shift transmission. With tractor in neutral and inching pedal pressed, toggle button is used to enter/exit creeper range.Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Distributor
FordReference
Variants
2160
similar Buhler Versatile modelReference
Engine
Engine
141.7 kWReference
145.4 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
106.1 kWReference
Displacement
7.5 LReference
6.6 LReference
Bore/Stroke
112 x 127 mmReference
112 x 112 mmReference
Power
141.7 kWReference
145.4 kWReference
Compression
17.5:1Reference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2200Reference
Firing order
1-5-3-6-2-4Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
Starter power
4.5 kWReference
Coolant capacity
25.0 LReference
Oil capacity
20.8 LReference
Max power
106.1 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
122.9 kWReference
Fuel tank
495.1 LReference
Torque
694.3 NmReference
Torque RPM
1600Reference
Starter type
electricReference
Transmission
Gears
32 forward and 18 reverseReference
16 forward and 4 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
119.3 kWReference
125.0 kWReference
PTO (tested)
138.6 kWReference
Hydraulic system
139.7 LReference
Type
creeperReference
two-speed power shiftReference
Capacity
139.7 LReference
Pressure
189.6 barReference
172.4 barReference
Valves
3Reference
3Reference
Pump flow
90.8 lpmReference
75.7 lpmReference
Total flow
208.2 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIIReference
IIIReference
Rear lift
5670 kgReference
6860 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1.375)Reference
1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@1903Reference
1000@1920Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
133.8 kWReference
Capacities
Fuel
416.4 LReference
Front hubs
1.6 LReference
Front diff.
12.3 LReference
Max capacity
14288 kgReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
311 cmReference
342 cmReference
Weight
16600 to 19000 poundsReference
9300 kgReference
Front tire
14L-16.1Reference
24.5x32Reference
Rear tire
18.4R42Reference
24.5x32Reference
Ag front
16.9R28 (4WD)Reference
24.5x32Reference
Ag rear
18.4R42Reference
24.5x32Reference
Length
499 cmReference
660 cmReference
Width
245 cmReference
264 cmReference
Height (cab)
308 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
315 cmReference
339 cmReference
Clearance (front axle)
50 cmReference
Clearance (drawbar)
47 cmReference
Front tread
157 to 220 cmReference
157 to 274 cmReference
Rear tread
153 to 325 cmReference
157 to 274 cmReference
Operating
8618 kgReference
Ford 8770 attachments
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
130Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery CCA
950Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
36.7 l/hourReference
Max pull
63 kgReference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)