Compare/International Harvester 1055 vs International Harvester 966
Search

International Harvester 1055 vs International Harvester 966

Verdict: International Harvester 1055 vs International Harvester 966

The International Harvester 1055 and the International Harvester 966 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. International Harvester 1055 leads on rated power with 100 hp against 96 hp. International Harvester 1055 is the lighter machine (9,635 kg vs 11,116 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. International Harvester 1055 is the newer design (1977 vs 1971). In short: choose the International Harvester 1055 for outright pulling power, or the International Harvester 966 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
International Harvester 1055 Tractor
International Harvester
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
International Harvester 966 Tractor
International Harvester
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
100 hp
96 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
International HarvesterReference
International HarvesterReference
liquid-cooledReference
The hydrostatic transmission option ended in 1973 when the Hydro 100 began production.Reference
Total built
21,017Reference
Engine
Fuel tank
140.0 LReference
Engine
74.6 kWReference
84.3 kWReference
Displacement
5.9 LReference
6.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
98 x 129 mmReference
109 x 121 mmReference
Power
74.6 kWReference
84.3 kWReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2600 (late)Reference
Drawbar (claimed)
62.6 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
63.5 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual dry elementsReference
Firing order
1-5-3-6-2-4Reference
Oil capacity
85.2 LReference
Coolant capacity
22.7 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
75.2 kWReference
Max power
63.5 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
16 forward and 8 reverseReference
infinite forward and reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
Transmission
Torque AmplifierReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Pump flow
36.0 lpmReference
45.4 lpmReference
Rear lift
4150 kgReference
2268 kgReference
Rear PTO Type
540, 1000Reference
540/1000Reference
PTO (claimed)
70.8 kWReference
PTO (tested)
75.2 kWReference
Hydraulic system
85.2 LReference
Type
hydrostaticReference
Capacity
85.2 LReference
Pressure
137.9 barReference
Valves
1 to 4Reference
Total flow
79.5 lpmReference
Steering flow
34.1 lpmReference
Steering press.
106.9 barReference
Rear Type
IIReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
1995 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Power at rated PTO speed
75.7 kWReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
262 cmReference
266 cmReference
Weight
9635 to 10473 poundsReference
11116 to 11700 poundsReference
Front tire
11.00-16Reference
9.5L-15Reference
Rear tire
18.4-38Reference
18.4-34Reference
Ag front
13.6-28 (MFWD)Reference
9.5L-15Reference
Ag rear
18.4-38Reference
18.4-34Reference
Length
425 cmReference
419 cmReference
Height
277 cmReference
2WD Weight
4370 kgReference
4WD Weight
4750 kgReference
Width
248 cmReference
Height (exhaust)
266 cmReference
Ground clearance
35 cmReference
Bar rear axle
82 mmReference
Operating
5307 kgReference
Ballasted
6123 kgReference
Variants
Hi-Clear
high-crop modelReference
Capacities
Fuel
140.0 LReference
966 Serial Numbers
1971
7101Reference
1972
11815Reference
1973
17794Reference
1974
22526Reference
1975
28119Reference
1976
31772Reference
Location:
Clutch housing, left sideReference
Electrical
Charging amps
32Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery volts
6Reference
Battery AH
172Reference
Test results
Fuel use
26.1 l/hourReference
Max pull
4552 kgReference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)